Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, USA.
Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2021 Jan;47(1):20-41. doi: 10.1177/0146167220913694. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
Reciprocity is a fundamental mechanism for sustained social relationships. Escalation-based theories suggest that reciprocity intensifies over time. In contrast, equity-based theories propose that people reciprocate behaviors in kind. We reconcile these conflicting perspectives by examining social exchanges across different cultural contexts. Using three complementary experiments, we investigate when, how, and why individuals in East Asian settings and those in North American settings differentially reciprocate positive versus negative behaviors over time. Study 1 demonstrated that in positively framed exchanges (i.e., giving) Americans escalated their reciprocity, but Singaporeans reciprocated in kind. However, in negatively framed exchanges (i.e., taking), Singaporeans escalated their reciprocity, but Americans reciprocated in kind. Study 2 replicated the results using Hong Kongers and showed that cultural differences in regulatory focus were associated with specific emotions (i.e., anxiety and happiness), which then escalated reciprocity. To establish causality, Study 3 manipulated regulatory focus within one culture and replicated the pattern of results.
互惠是维持社会关系的基本机制。基于升级的理论表明,互惠关系随着时间的推移而加剧。相比之下,基于公平的理论则认为人们会以同样的方式回报行为。我们通过考察不同文化背景下的社会交换来调和这些相互矛盾的观点。我们使用三个互补的实验,研究了东亚人和北美人在不同时间如何以及为何对积极和消极行为做出不同的互惠反应。研究 1 表明,在积极框架的交换(即给予)中,美国人会升级他们的互惠关系,但新加坡人会以同样的方式回报。然而,在消极框架的交换(即索取)中,新加坡人会升级他们的互惠关系,但美国人会以同样的方式回报。研究 2 使用香港人重复了这些结果,并表明监管焦点的文化差异与特定的情绪(即焦虑和幸福)有关,这些情绪随后会加剧互惠关系。为了建立因果关系,研究 3 在一种文化内操纵监管焦点,并复制了结果模式。