Northern Plains Agricultural Research Laboratory, USDA-ARS Pest Management Research Unit, 1500 North Central Ave, Sidney, MT, 59270, USA.
Department of Biological Sciences, Wichita State University, 1845 Fairmount St., Wichita, KS, 67260, USA.
Oecologia. 2020 May;193(1):143-153. doi: 10.1007/s00442-020-04656-2. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
Whether plant populations are limited by seed or microsite availability is a long-standing debate. However, since both can be important, increasing emphasis is placed on disentangling their relative importance and how they vary through space and time. Although uncommon, seed addition studies that include multiple levels of seed augmentation, and follow plants through to the adult stage, are critical to achieving this goal. Such data are also vital to understanding when biotic pressures, such as herbivory, influence plant abundance. In this study, we experimentally added seeds of a native thistle, Cirsium canescens, at four augmentation densities to plots at two long-term study sites and quantified densities of seedlings and reproductive adults over 9 years. Recruitment to both seedling and adult stages was strongly seed-limited at both sites; however, the relative strength of seed limitation decreased with plant age. Fitting alternative recruitment functions to our data indicated that post-dispersal mortality factors were important as well. Strong density-dependent mortality limited recruitment at one site, while density-independent limitation predominated at the other. Overall, our experimental seed addition demonstrates that the environment at these sites remains suitable for C. canescens survival to reproduction and that seed availability limits adult densities. The results thus provide support for the hypothesis that seed losses due to the invasive weevil, Rhinocyllus conicus, rather than shifting microsite conditions, are driving C. canescens population declines. Shifts in the importance of density-dependent recruitment limitation between sites highlights that alternate strategies may be necessary to recover plant populations at different locations.
植物种群是否受到种子或微生境可用性的限制是一个长期存在的争论。然而,由于两者都可能很重要,因此越来越重视厘清它们的相对重要性以及它们如何随空间和时间变化。虽然很少见,但包括多个种子增强水平并跟踪植物到成年阶段的种子添加研究对于实现这一目标至关重要。这些数据对于理解生物压力(如草食性)如何影响植物丰度也至关重要。在这项研究中,我们在两个长期研究地点的样地中以四个增强密度水平实验性地添加了一种本地蓟草 Cirsium canescens 的种子,并在 9 年内量化了幼苗和繁殖成体的密度。在两个地点,幼苗和成年阶段的繁殖都受到强烈的种子限制;然而,种子限制的相对强度随着植物年龄的增加而降低。对我们的数据拟合替代繁殖功能表明,种子扩散后死亡率因素也很重要。一个地点的强烈密度依赖死亡率限制了繁殖,而另一个地点则以密度独立限制为主。总的来说,我们的实验性种子添加表明,这些地点的环境仍然适合 C. canescens 从生存到繁殖,并且种子可用性限制了成体密度。因此,结果支持了这样的假设,即由于入侵性象鼻虫 Rhinocyllus conicus 导致的种子损失,而不是微生境条件的变化,是导致 C. canescens 种群减少的原因。不同地点之间密度依赖型繁殖限制重要性的变化突出表明,在不同地点恢复植物种群可能需要不同的策略。