• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在标准新辅助放疗基础上添加贝伐珠单抗可提高直肠癌完全缓解率。

Adding Boost to Standard Neoadjuvant Radiation for Rectal Cancer Improves Likelihood of Complete Response.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Research in Surgical Outcomes & Effectiveness Center (UH-RISES), University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.

Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.

出版信息

J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 Jul;24(7):1655-1662. doi: 10.1007/s11605-020-04594-7. Epub 2020 Apr 22.

DOI:10.1007/s11605-020-04594-7
PMID:32323253
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pathologic tumor response is a prognostic factor for survival in patients with rectal cancer. Standard neoadjuvant radiation (nRT) dosing for locally advanced rectal cancer ranges from 4500 to 5400 centigray (cGy), but it is unknown if tumor regression differs as a consequence adding a boost to the tumor bed.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database (NCDB) 2006-2016 was used to identify patients 18 years of age and older with clinical stage II and III rectal cancer who received pelvic nRT dosed between 4500 and 5400 cGy. Standard nRT dose (no boost, NB) and dose with boost (DWB) were defined respectively as 4500 and 5040-5400 cGy. Complete pathologic response (pCR) was defined as postoperative pathologic stage of zero. A multivariate logistic regression was performed to evaluate the association between radiation dosing and pCR.

RESULTS

The study cohort was 28,841 patients; the majority received DWB 22,701 (78.7%), while 6140 (21.3%) received NB. pCR was achieved in 3135 (14.4%) patients. On multivariate analysis, patients who received NB were significantly less likely to have complete tumor response (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.2-1.66, p < 0.001). Other factors significantly associated with pCR included insurance, facility type, tumor characteristics, clinical stage, and time between radiation and surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first investigation demonstrating that standard dose neoadjuvant radiation for rectal cancer was associated with a lower likelihood of pCR compared with standard dose with boost. Past studies demonstrate that rectal cancer patient survival is strongly correlated with pCR. Prospective trials should focus on examining neoadjuvant radiation dosing to evaluate if DWB improves outcomes.

摘要

背景

肿瘤病理性缓解是直肠癌患者生存的预后因素。局部晚期直肠癌的标准新辅助放疗(nRT)剂量范围为 4500 至 5400 厘戈瑞(cGy),但尚不清楚在肿瘤床添加增敏照射是否会导致肿瘤退缩程度不同。

方法

利用国家癌症数据库(NCDB)2006 年至 2016 年的数据,确定年龄在 18 岁及以上、临床分期为 II 期和 III 期直肠癌患者,这些患者接受的盆腔 nRT 剂量在 4500 至 5400 cGy 之间。标准 nRT 剂量(无增敏,NB)和增敏剂量(DWB)分别定义为 4500 和 5040-5400 cGy。完全病理性缓解(pCR)定义为术后病理分期为零。采用多因素逻辑回归评估放疗剂量与 pCR 的关系。

结果

研究队列包括 28841 例患者;大多数患者接受 DWB(22701 例,78.7%),6140 例(21.3%)接受 NB。3135 例(14.4%)患者达到 pCR。多因素分析显示,接受 NB 的患者完全肿瘤缓解的可能性显著降低(OR 1.41,95%CI 1.2-1.66,p<0.001)。其他与 pCR 显著相关的因素包括保险类型、机构类型、肿瘤特征、临床分期和放疗与手术之间的时间。

结论

这是第一项表明标准剂量新辅助放疗与标准剂量加增敏照射相比,直肠癌患者发生 pCR 的可能性较低的研究。既往研究表明,直肠癌患者的生存与 pCR 密切相关。前瞻性试验应重点研究新辅助放疗剂量,以评估 DWB 是否能改善治疗效果。

相似文献

1
Adding Boost to Standard Neoadjuvant Radiation for Rectal Cancer Improves Likelihood of Complete Response.在标准新辅助放疗基础上添加贝伐珠单抗可提高直肠癌完全缓解率。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 Jul;24(7):1655-1662. doi: 10.1007/s11605-020-04594-7. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
2
A phase I/II trial of three-dimensionally planned concurrent boost radiotherapy and protracted venous infusion of 5-FU chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal carcinoma.一项针对局部晚期直肠癌的三维计划同步加量放疗与5-氟尿嘧啶化疗持续静脉输注的I/II期试验。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001 Aug 1;50(5):1299-308. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(01)01540-1.
3
Tumor Volume as Predictor of Pathologic Complete Response Following Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.肿瘤体积对局部晚期直肠癌新辅助放化疗后病理完全缓解的预测价值。
Am J Clin Oncol. 2021 Sep 1;44(9):482-486. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000846.
4
Prognostic value of neoadjuvant treatment response in locally advanced rectal cancer.新辅助治疗反应在局部晚期直肠癌中的预后价值
J Surg Res. 2018 Jun;226:15-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.01.025. Epub 2018 Feb 10.
5
[Short-term outcome of programmed cell death protein1 (PD-1) antibody combined with total neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced middle-low rectal cancer with high risk factors].程序性死亡蛋白1(PD-1)抗体联合全新辅助放化疗治疗具有高危因素的局部进展期中低位直肠癌的短期疗效
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Nov 25;24(11):998-1007. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20210927-00386.
6
Impact of interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery in rectal cancer patients.新辅助放化疗与手术间隔时间对直肠癌患者的影响。
World J Gastroenterol. 2020 Aug 21;26(31):4624-4638. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i31.4624.
7
[Rectum-preserving surgery after consolidation neoadjuvant therapy or totally neoadjuvant therapy for low rectal cancer: a preliminary report].巩固性新辅助治疗或全新辅助治疗后低位直肠癌的保直肠手术:初步报告
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Mar 25;23(3):281-288. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20200228-00096.
8
Efficacy of Dose-Escalated Chemoradiation on Complete Tumor Response in Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer (RECTAL-BOOST): A Phase 2 Randomized Controlled Trial.剂量递增放化疗对局部晚期直肠癌患者肿瘤完全缓解的疗效(RECTAL-BOOST):一项2期随机对照试验
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020 Nov 15;108(4):1008-1018. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.06.013. Epub 2020 Jun 19.
9
Disparities in neoadjuvant radiation dosing for treatment of rectal cancer.直肠癌新辅助放疗剂量的差异。
Am J Surg. 2020 Oct;220(4):987-992. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.01.016. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
10
Korean Society of Coloproctology (KSCP) trial of cONsolidation Chemotherapy for Locally advanced mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjUvant concurrent chemoraDiothErapy: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial (KONCLUDE).韩国结直肠外科学会(KSCP)新辅助同期放化疗后局部中低位进展期直肠癌巩固化疗的临床试验:一项多中心、随机对照试验(KONCLUDE)。
BMC Cancer. 2018 May 8;18(1):538. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4466-7.