• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人权不受束缚:对更全面地将人权应用于老年人及其他群体的无悔呼吁。

Human rights unbound: An unrepentant call for a more complete application of human rights in relation to older persons-And beyond.

作者信息

Byrnes Andrew

机构信息

Faculty of Law, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Australian Institute for Human Rights and Ageing Futures Institute UNSW, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Australas J Ageing. 2020 Jun;39(2):91-98. doi: 10.1111/ajag.12800. Epub 2020 Apr 23.

DOI:10.1111/ajag.12800
PMID:32323919
Abstract

This article argues that, in relation to ageing issues in Australian society, we need to more strongly embrace an explicit and comprehensive human rights framework in analysing what is going on in our society and to adopt a much more robust and demanding human rights approach to policy development and holding government accountable for its actions and inaction. This means not just the explicit invocation of existing human rights norms to ageing issues, but also the development of new norms and interpretations of human rights that more fully reflect the perspectives of older persons than current mainstream norms do. The argument is developed through an analysis of reports of the Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety and into Violence against Persons with Disabilities. It maintains that these bodies and others engaged in policymaking relating to older persons in Australian society can enhance their work by systematically applying a comprehensive and robust human rights framework.

摘要

本文认为,就澳大利亚社会的老龄化问题而言,在分析我们社会中正在发生的事情时,我们需要更有力地采用明确且全面的人权框架,并在政策制定以及要求政府对其行动和不作为负责方面采取更有力、更严格的人权方法。这不仅意味着明确援引现有人权规范来处理老龄化问题,还意味着制定新的人权规范和解释,使其比当前的主流规范更充分地反映老年人的观点。该论点是通过对老年护理质量与安全皇家委员会以及针对残疾人暴力行为皇家委员会的报告进行分析得出的。它坚持认为,这些机构以及澳大利亚社会中其他参与老年人政策制定的机构,可以通过系统地应用全面且有力的人权框架来改进其工作。

相似文献

1
Human rights unbound: An unrepentant call for a more complete application of human rights in relation to older persons-And beyond.人权不受束缚:对更全面地将人权应用于老年人及其他群体的无悔呼吁。
Australas J Ageing. 2020 Jun;39(2):91-98. doi: 10.1111/ajag.12800. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
2
Social participation in Australian residential aged care: A human rights perspective.澳大利亚养老院老年人的社会参与:从人权角度来看。
Australas J Ageing. 2024 Jun;43(2):403-408. doi: 10.1111/ajag.13311. Epub 2024 Apr 13.
3
Health-related rehabilitation and human rights: analyzing states' obligations under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.与健康相关的康复与人权:分析各国根据《联合国残疾人权利公约》承担的义务
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Jan;96(1):163-73. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.07.410. Epub 2014 Aug 15.
4
The disability-rights perspective within the bioethics agenda.残疾权利视角在生物伦理学议程中的地位。
Nurs Ethics. 2020 Jun;27(4):1056-1065. doi: 10.1177/0969733020906599. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
5
The Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and its take on sexuality.残疾人权利委员会及其对性取向的看法。
Reprod Health Matters. 2017 May;25(50):92-103. doi: 10.1080/09688080.2017.1332449.
6
When detainees have a disability: Their rights and fundamental freedoms.当被拘留者存在残疾情况时:他们的权利和基本自由。
Int J Prison Health. 2009;5(3):113-31. doi: 10.1080/17449200903115763.
7
Effective implementation of the UNCRPD by Thailand State Party: challenges and potential remedies.泰国缔约国有效实施《联合国残疾人权利公约》:挑战与潜在补救措施。
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2017 May 25;17(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12914-017-0123-5.
8
Introducing an Equal Rights Framework for Older Persons in Residential Care.引入针对住宿护理机构中老年人的平等权利框架。
Gerontologist. 2016 Oct;56(5):800-6. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnv039. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
9
Technology, ageing and human rights: Challenges for an ageing world.技术、老龄化与人权:老龄化世界的挑战。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2019 Sep-Oct;66:101449. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.101449. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
10
The concept of capacity in Australian mental health law reform: Going in the wrong direction?澳大利亚精神卫生法改革中的能力概念:是否走错了方向?
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2015 May-Jun;40:60-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2015.04.006. Epub 2015 May 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Counting the costs of ageism: Discrimination and COVID-19.计算年龄歧视的代价:歧视与新冠疫情
Australas J Ageing. 2021 Sep;40(3):237-240. doi: 10.1111/ajag.12993. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
2
Navigating the Minefield: Managing Refusal of Medical Care in Older Adults with Chronic Symptoms of Mental Illness.穿越雷区:管理有慢性精神疾病症状的老年人拒绝医疗护理。
Clin Interv Aging. 2021 Jul 12;16:1315-1325. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S311773. eCollection 2021.
3
Advocacy for the human rights of older people in the COVID pandemic and beyond: a call to mental health professionals.
倡导新冠疫情期间及之后老年人的人权:致心理健康专业人士的呼吁。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2020 Oct;32(10):1199-1204. doi: 10.1017/S1041610220001076. Epub 2020 Jun 3.