Takács Tibor, Mihalovits Gábor, Váradi Rita, Palásthy Zsolt
Általános Orvostudományi Kar, Szent-Györgyi Albert Klinikai Központ, Sebészeti Klinika,Szegedi TudományegyetemSzeged, Semmelweis u. 8., 6720.
Orv Hetil. 2020 Apr 1;161(15):588-593. doi: 10.1556/650.2020.31684.
Introduction: The incidence of peripheral arterial diseases and the rate of chronic limb-threatening ischaemia are increasing year by year. Minimally invasive peripheral interventions have gradually replaced traditional operations. Earlier steno-occlusion of the popliteal artery was an indication for femoropopliteal bypass below the knee. Nowadays, endovascular procedures are also used, but the indication of the stent placement into the popliteal artery is controversial. Aim: We have been using Jaguar stent for the treatment of popliteal artery steno-occlusion since January 2016. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of this treatment. Method: We included patients who underwent popliteal artery angioplasty with Jaguar stent placement between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2017 in our department. During the one-year follow-up, we examined the popliteal stent patency, amputation-free survival and risk factors that influence stent patency. Statistical analysis: For the comparison of mean values, two-sided t-tests were used. Categorical data were analyzed by using chi-square test. Results: 33 patients underwent popliteal or femoropopliteal endovascular intervention with Jaguar stent placement into the popliteal artery. Postoperative complications that required surgical treatment occurred in 2 patients. At the end of the follow-up, the primary patency of the popliteal stents was 58.1%, the secondary patency was 74.2% and amputation-free survival was 96.8%. Conclusion: Compared with international data, the primary patency of the Jaguar stents in our study is relatively lower, but amputation-free survival is much better, and in most cases there is less operative strain compared with traditional operations. Orv Hetil. 2020; 161(15): 588–593.
外周动脉疾病的发病率和慢性肢体威胁性缺血的发生率逐年上升。微创外周介入治疗已逐渐取代传统手术。早期腘动脉狭窄闭塞是膝下股腘动脉搭桥术的指征。如今,血管内介入治疗也被采用,但在腘动脉置入支架的指征仍存在争议。目的:自2016年1月起,我们一直使用捷豹支架治疗腘动脉狭窄闭塞。本研究的目的是评估这种治疗方法的疗效。方法:我们纳入了2016年1月1日至2017年12月31日在我科接受腘动脉血管成形术并置入捷豹支架的患者。在一年的随访期间,我们检查了腘动脉支架的通畅情况、无截肢生存率以及影响支架通畅的危险因素。统计分析:采用双侧t检验比较均值。分类数据采用卡方检验进行分析。结果:33例患者接受了腘动脉或股腘动脉血管内介入治疗,并在腘动脉置入了捷豹支架。2例患者出现需要手术治疗的术后并发症。随访结束时,腘动脉支架的原发通畅率为58.1%,继发通畅率为74.2%,无截肢生存率为96.8%。结论:与国际数据相比,我们研究中捷豹支架的原发通畅率相对较低,但无截肢生存率要好得多,而且在大多数情况下,与传统手术相比手术应激较小。《匈牙利医学周报》。2020年;161(15):588–593。