Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Eur J Cancer. 2020 Jun;132:43-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.03.018. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
BACKGROUND: Immune-based strategies represent a promising approach in breast cancer (BC) treatment. The glycoprotein mucin-1 (MUC-1) is overexpressed in more than 90% of BC patients, and is targeted by the cancer vaccine tecemotide. We have investigated the efficacy and safety of tecemotide when added to neoadjuvant standard-of-care (SoC) treatment in early BC patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 400 patients with HER2-early BC were recruited into this prospective, multicentre, randomised 2-arm academic phase II trial. Patients received preoperative SoC treatment (chemotherapy or endocrine therapy) with or without tecemotide. Postmenopausal women with oestrogen receptor (ER)+++, or ER++ and Ki67 < 14%, and G1,2 tumours ('luminal A' tumours) received 6 months of letrozole. Postmenopausal patients with triple-negative, ER-/+/++ and Ki67 ≥ 14%, and with G3 tumours, as well as premenopausal patients, received four cycles of epirubicin/cyclophosphamide plus four cycles of docetaxel. Primary end-point was residual cancer burden (RCB; 0/I versus II/III) at surgery. Secondary end-points included pathological complete response (pCR), safety, and quality of life. FINDINGS: We observed no significant difference in RCB 0/I rates between patients with (36.4%) and without (31.9%) tecemotide in the overall study population (p = 0.40) nor in endocrine and chemotherapy-treated subgroups (25.0% versus 13.3%, p = 0.17; 39.6% versus 37.8%, p = 0.75, respectively). The addition of tecemotide did not affect overall pCR rates (22.5% versus 17.4%, p = 0.23), MUC-1 expression, or tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes content. Tecemotide did not increase toxicity when compared to SoC therapy alone. INTERPRETATION: Neoadjuvant tecemotide is safe, but does not improve RCB or pCR rates in patients receiving standard neoadjuvant therapy.
背景:免疫策略代表了乳腺癌(BC)治疗的一种有前途的方法。糖蛋白黏蛋白-1(MUC-1)在超过 90%的 BC 患者中过表达,并被癌症疫苗替西莫肽靶向。我们已经研究了替西莫肽在早期 BC 患者新辅助标准治疗(SoC)中添加时的疗效和安全性。
患者和方法:共有 400 名 HER2-早期 BC 患者被纳入这项前瞻性、多中心、随机 2 臂学术 II 期试验。患者接受术前 SoC 治疗(化疗或内分泌治疗),并添加或不添加替西莫肽。雌激素受体(ER)+++或 ER++且 Ki67<14%且 G1、2 肿瘤(“luminal A”肿瘤)的绝经后妇女接受 6 个月的来曲唑治疗。三阴性、ER-/+/++且 Ki67≥14%且 G3 肿瘤的绝经前患者以及绝经前患者接受 4 个周期的表柔比星/环磷酰胺联合 4 个周期的多西他赛治疗。主要终点是手术时的残留癌负荷(RCB;0/I 与 II/III)。次要终点包括病理完全缓解(pCR)、安全性和生活质量。
结果:我们观察到在整个研究人群中,添加替西莫肽的患者(36.4%)与未添加的患者(31.9%)之间 RCB 0/I 率无显著差异(p=0.40),也在内分泌和化疗治疗亚组中无显著差异(25.0%与 13.3%,p=0.17;39.6%与 37.8%,p=0.75)。添加替西莫肽不会影响总体 pCR 率(22.5%与 17.4%,p=0.23)、MUC-1 表达或肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞含量。与单独接受 SoC 治疗相比,替西莫肽并未增加毒性。
结论:新辅助替西莫肽是安全的,但不能提高接受标准新辅助治疗的患者的 RCB 或 pCR 率。
Front Dent Med. 2024-11-21
Front Immunol. 2024
Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2023-9-20
J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2023-11-14
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023