• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过适应性框架管理干旱景观中的流浪猫。

Managing feral cats through an adaptive framework in an arid landscape.

机构信息

Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Locked Bag 104, Bentley Delivery Centre, Western Australia 6983, Australia.

Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Locked Bag 104, Bentley Delivery Centre, Western Australia 6983, Australia.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2020 Jun 10;720:137631. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137631. Epub 2020 Feb 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137631
PMID:32325591
Abstract

Adaptive management is the systematic acquisition and application of reliable information to improve natural resource management over time. We have employed an adaptive management framework in the control and monitoring of feral cats (Felis catus) on the Matuwa Indigenous Protected Area over the past 16 years. We used 120 Reconyx PC900 camera-traps and a rapid survey technique called the cat track activity index (TAI) to determine if aerial baiting with Eradicat® was more efficient and/or cost-effective than track baiting plus leg-hold trapping. We found that aerial baiting at $0.54 per percent decrease in cat detections is more cost-effective than track-baiting alone at $0.56 per percent decrease in cat detections. Track baiting plus leg-hold trapping, however, is more cost-effective than aerial baiting alone at reducing the number of feral cats detections at $0.39 per percent decrease in cat detections. Aerial baiting plus trapping was the most effective method of suppressing feral cats in an arid landscape with 97.7% reduction in cat detections. Trapping reduced the proportion of the population made up of adult cats from 51.5% to 38.7%, which may influence the efficacy of Eradicat®. Additionally, we found that cats were twice as likely to be detected on spinifex sandplain habitats than stony or hardpan habitats. We make several recommendations for refining feral cat management programs and future research.

摘要

自适应管理是系统地获取和应用可靠信息,以随着时间的推移改善自然资源管理。在过去的 16 年里,我们在 Matuwa 原住民保护区对野猫(Felis catus)的控制和监测中采用了自适应管理框架。我们使用了 120 个 Reconyx PC900 相机陷阱和一种称为猫足迹活动指数(TAI)的快速调查技术,以确定使用 Eradicat®进行空中诱饵是否比跟踪诱饵加腿夹陷阱更有效和/或更具成本效益。我们发现,空中诱饵每降低 0.54%的猫检测率的成本为 0.56 美元,比单独使用跟踪诱饵每降低 0.56%的猫检测率更具成本效益。然而,跟踪诱饵加腿夹陷阱比单独使用空中诱饵更具成本效益,因为它可以降低猫检测率每降低 0.39%的野猫数量。空中诱饵加诱捕是在干旱景观中抑制野猫的最有效方法,猫的检测率降低了 97.7%。诱捕使成年猫在种群中的比例从 51.5%降低到 38.7%,这可能会影响 Eradicat®的效果。此外,我们发现猫在刺山柑平原栖息地被发现的可能性是在石质或硬磐栖息地的两倍。我们为改进野猫管理计划和未来的研究提出了一些建议。

相似文献

1
Managing feral cats through an adaptive framework in an arid landscape.通过适应性框架管理干旱景观中的流浪猫。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Jun 10;720:137631. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137631. Epub 2020 Feb 29.
2
Does aerial baiting for controlling feral cats in a heterogeneous landscape confer benefits to a threatened native meso-predator?在异质景观中,通过空中投食来控制野猫,这会给受威胁的本地中型捕食者带来好处吗?
PLoS One. 2021 May 7;16(5):e0251304. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251304. eCollection 2021.
3
Two Methods of Monitoring Cats at a Landscape-Scale.在景观尺度上监测猫的两种方法。
Animals (Basel). 2021 Dec 15;11(12):3562. doi: 10.3390/ani11123562.
4
Evaluating the efficacy of a landscape scale feral cat control program using camera traps and occupancy models.利用相机陷阱和占有模型评估景观尺度的野猫控制计划的效果。
Sci Rep. 2018 Mar 28;8(1):5335. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23495-z.
5
Measuring, evaluating and improving the effectiveness of invasive predator control programs: Feral cat baiting as a case study.衡量、评估和提高入侵性捕食者控制项目的有效性:以野外诱捕猫为例。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Feb 15;280:111691. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111691. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
6
Desires and management preferences of stakeholders regarding feral cats in the Hawaiian islands.夏威夷群岛利益相关者对野猫的期望及管理偏好。
Conserv Biol. 2014 Apr;28(2):392-403. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12201. Epub 2013 Dec 20.
7
Field assessment of the risk of feral cat baits to nontarget species in eastern Australia.在澳大利亚东部,实地评估野化猫诱饵对非目标物种的风险。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2022 Jan;18(1):224-244. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4445. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
8
Raiders of the last ark: the impacts of feral cats on small mammals in Tasmanian forest ecosystems.最后的方舟掠夺者:野化猫科动物对塔斯马尼亚森林生态系统中小哺乳动物的影响。
Ecol Appl. 2021 Sep;31(6):e02362. doi: 10.1002/eap.2362. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
9
Managing feral cats on a university's campuses: how many are there and is sterilization having an effect?管理大学校园里的野猫:校园里有多少野猫,绝育措施是否有效?
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2011;14(4):304-20. doi: 10.1080/10888705.2011.600186.
10
Using Genetics to Evaluate the Success of a Feral Cat () Control Program in North-Western Australia.利用遗传学评估澳大利亚西北部野猫控制项目的成效。
Animals (Basel). 2019 Dec 1;9(12):1050. doi: 10.3390/ani9121050.

引用本文的文献

1
Two Methods of Monitoring Cats at a Landscape-Scale.在景观尺度上监测猫的两种方法。
Animals (Basel). 2021 Dec 15;11(12):3562. doi: 10.3390/ani11123562.
2
Long-Distance Movements of Feral Cats in Semi-Arid South Australia and Implications for Conservation Management.南澳大利亚半干旱地区野猫的远距离移动及其对保护管理的影响
Animals (Basel). 2021 Oct 31;11(11):3125. doi: 10.3390/ani11113125.
3
Two species, one island: Retrospective analysis of threatened fauna translocations with divergent outcomes.两个物种,一个岛屿:具有不同结果的受威胁动物迁移的回顾性分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 12;16(7):e0253962. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253962. eCollection 2021.
4
Does aerial baiting for controlling feral cats in a heterogeneous landscape confer benefits to a threatened native meso-predator?在异质景观中,通过空中投食来控制野猫,这会给受威胁的本地中型捕食者带来好处吗?
PLoS One. 2021 May 7;16(5):e0251304. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251304. eCollection 2021.