• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于计算机模拟与实车碰撞试验的正面碰撞乘员初步损伤风险评估

Preliminary injury risk estimation for occupants involved in frontal crashes by combining computer simulations and real crashes.

机构信息

Chongqing Key Laboratory of Vehicle Crash/Bio-impact and Traffic Safety, Institute of Surgery Research, Third Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.

First Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.

出版信息

Sci Prog. 2020 Apr-Jun;103(2):36850420908750. doi: 10.1177/0036850420908750.

DOI:10.1177/0036850420908750
PMID:32326837
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10452757/
Abstract

The fatality rate can be dramatically reduced with the help of emergency medical services. The purpose of this study was to establish a computational algorithm to predict the injury severity, so as to improve the timeliness, appropriateness, and efficacy of medical care provided. The computer simulations of full-frontal crashes with rigid wall were carried out using LS-DYNA and MADYMO under different collision speeds, airbag deployment time, and seatbelt wearing condition, in which a total of 84 times simulation was conducted. Then an artificial neural network is adopted to construct relevance between head and chest injuries and the injury risk factors; 37 accident cases with Event Data Recorder data and information on occupant injury were collected to validate the model accuracy through receiver operating characteristic analysis. The results showed that delta-v, seatbelt wearing condition, and airbag deployment time were important factors in the occupant's head and chest injuries. When delta-v increased, the occupant had significantly higher level of severe injury on the head and chest; there is a significant difference of Head Injury Criterion and Combined Thoracic Index whether the occupant wore seatbelt. When the airbag deployment time was less than 20 ms, the severity of head and chest injuries did not significantly vary with the increase of deployment time. However, when the deployment time exceeded 20 ms, the severity of head and chest injuries significantly increased with increase in deployment time. The validation result of the algorithm showed that area under the curve = 0.747,  < 0.05, indicating a medium level of accuracy, nearly to previous model. The computer simulation and artificial neural network have a great potential for developing injury risk estimation algorithms suitable for Advanced Automatic Crash Notification applications, which could assist in medical decision-making and medical care.

摘要

在紧急医疗服务的帮助下,死亡率可以显著降低。本研究的目的是建立一种计算算法来预测损伤严重程度,以提高医疗服务的及时性、适当性和有效性。使用 LS-DYNA 和 MADYMO 在不同的碰撞速度、安全气囊展开时间和安全带佩戴条件下对正面碰撞进行了计算机模拟,总共进行了 84 次模拟。然后采用人工神经网络构建头部和胸部损伤与损伤风险因素之间的相关性;收集了 37 起带有事件数据记录器数据和乘员受伤信息的事故案例,通过接收者操作特征分析验证模型的准确性。结果表明,Delta-V、安全带佩戴条件和安全气囊展开时间是乘员头部和胸部受伤的重要因素。当 Delta-V 增加时,乘员头部和胸部的严重受伤程度显著增加;无论乘员是否佩戴安全带,头部损伤准则和胸部综合指数都有显著差异。当安全气囊展开时间小于 20ms 时,头部和胸部损伤的严重程度随展开时间的增加而没有显著变化。然而,当展开时间超过 20ms 时,头部和胸部损伤的严重程度随展开时间的增加而显著增加。算法的验证结果表明,曲线下面积=0.747,<0.05,表明准确性处于中等水平,接近之前的模型。计算机模拟和人工神经网络在开发适合高级自动碰撞通知应用的损伤风险估计算法方面具有很大的潜力,这可以帮助进行医疗决策和医疗护理。

相似文献

1
Preliminary injury risk estimation for occupants involved in frontal crashes by combining computer simulations and real crashes.基于计算机模拟与实车碰撞试验的正面碰撞乘员初步损伤风险评估
Sci Prog. 2020 Apr-Jun;103(2):36850420908750. doi: 10.1177/0036850420908750.
2
Adapting load limiter deployment for frontal crash diversity.适应正面碰撞多样性的限载器展开。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(sup2):S43-S49. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2019.1702648. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
3
Improving the Chest Protection of Elderly Occupants in Frontal Crashes Using SMART Load Limiters.使用智能负载限制器提高老年驾乘人员在正面碰撞中的胸部保护。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16 Suppl 2:S77-86. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1064528.
4
Injury comparisons between paired drivers and front-seat passengers in frontal collisions using publicly available crash and injury data.利用公开的碰撞和伤害数据,对正面碰撞中配对驾驶员和前排乘客的伤害进行比较。
J Forensic Sci. 2024 Jan;69(1):153-161. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.15404. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
5
Driver Injury Risk Variability in Finite Element Reconstructions of Crash Injury Research and Engineering Network (CIREN) Frontal Motor Vehicle Crashes.碰撞损伤研究与工程网络(CIREN)正面机动车碰撞有限元重建中驾驶员损伤风险的变异性
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16 Suppl 2:S124-31. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1061666.
6
Evaluation of Vehicle-Based Crash Severity Metrics.基于车辆的碰撞严重程度指标评估。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16 Suppl 2:S132-9. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1067693.
7
Optimizing Seat Belt and Airbag Designs for Rear Seat Occupant Protection in Frontal Crashes.优化安全带和安全气囊设计以保护正面碰撞中后排乘客
Stapp Car Crash J. 2017 Nov;61:67-100. doi: 10.4271/2017-22-0004.
8
Estimated injury risk for specific injuries and body regions in frontal motor vehicle crashes.正面机动车碰撞中特定损伤和身体部位的估计受伤风险。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16 Suppl 1:S108-16. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1012664.
9
Dummy measurement of chest injuries induced by two-point shoulder belts.两点式安全带致胸部损伤的虚拟测量
Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med. 2000;44:1-15.
10
Crash characteristics and injury patterns of restrained front seat occupants in far-side impacts.远侧碰撞中受约束前排乘客的碰撞特征和损伤模式。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15 Suppl 1(0 1):S27-34. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2014.935771.

本文引用的文献

1
Predicting death by suicide using administrative health care system data: Can feedforward neural network models improve upon logistic regression models?利用行政医疗保健系统数据预测自杀死亡:前馈神经网络模型能否优于逻辑回归模型?
J Affect Disord. 2019 Oct 1;257:741-747. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.07.063. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
2
Comparison of artificial neural network and logistic regression models for prediction of outcomes in trauma patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.人工神经网络与逻辑回归模型对创伤患者结局预测的比较:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Injury. 2019 Feb;50(2):244-250. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.01.007. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
3
Serious injury prediction algorithm based on large-scale data and under-triage control.
基于大规模数据和低分流控制的严重损伤预测算法
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Jan;98:266-276. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.09.028. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
4
Artificial neural networks versus bivariate logistic regression in prediction diagnosis of patients with hypertension and diabetes.人工神经网络与二元逻辑回归在高血压合并糖尿病患者预测诊断中的比较
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2016 Jan 3;30:312. eCollection 2016.
5
Comparison and validation of injury risk classifiers for advanced automated crash notification systems.先进自动碰撞通知系统损伤风险分类器的比较与验证
Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15 Suppl 1:S126-33. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2014.927577.
6
Development of brain injury criteria (BrIC).脑损伤标准(BrIC)的制定。
Stapp Car Crash J. 2013 Nov;57:243-66. doi: 10.4271/2013-22-0010.
7
The effect of earlier or automatic collision notification on traffic mortality by survival analysis.生存分析中更早或自动碰撞通知对交通死亡率的影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2013;14 Suppl:S50-7. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2013.799279.
8
Finite element analysis of occupant head injuries: parametric effects of the side curtain airbag deployment interaction with a dummy head in a side impact crash.乘员头部损伤的有限元分析:侧面帘式气囊展开与侧面碰撞中假人头相互作用的参数影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Jun;55:232-41. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.03.016. Epub 2013 Mar 19.
9
Comparisons of the Outcome Prediction Performance of Injury Severity Scoring Tools Using the Abbreviated Injury Scale 90 Update 98 (AIS 98) and 2005 Update 2008 (AIS 2008).使用简明损伤定级标准90版更新98版(AIS 98)和2005版更新2008版(AIS 2008)的损伤严重度评分工具的结果预测性能比较
Ann Adv Automot Med. 2011;55:255-65.
10
Comparison of artificial neural network and logistic regression models for predicting mortality in elderly patients with hip fracture.人工神经网络与逻辑回归模型在预测老年髋部骨折患者死亡率中的比较。
Injury. 2010 Aug;41(8):869-73. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.04.023. Epub 2010 May 21.