Alexandrou Maria Eleni, Loutradis Charalampos, Schoina Maria, Tzanis Georgios, Dimitriadis Chrysostomos, Sachpekidis Vasileios, Papadopoulou Dorothea, Gkaliagkousi Εugenia, Papagianni Aikaterini, Parati Gianfranco, Sarafidis Pantelis
Department of Nephrology, Hippokration Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Department of Nephrology, Papageorgiou General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Hypertens Res. 2020 Sep;43(9):903-913. doi: 10.1038/s41440-020-0442-0. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
Hypertension in end-stage renal disease patients is highly prevalent and poorly controlled. Data on the ambulatory blood pressure (BP) profile and BP variability (BPV) in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients are absent. This study examined the BP profile and BPV of patients undergoing PD in comparison with hemodialysis (HD) and predialysis chronic kidney disease CKD patients. Thirty-eight PD patients were matched for age, sex, and dialysis vintage with 76 HD patients and for age and sex with 38 patients with CKD stage 2-4. Patients under PD or HD underwent 48-h and CKD patients 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring. BP levels and BPV indices were compared for the 48-h, first and second 24 h, daytime and nighttime periods. Two-way mixed ANOVA for repeated measurements was used to evaluate the effects of dialysis modality and time on ambulatory BP in PD and HD. During all periods studied, SBP and DBP were numerically higher but not significantly different in PD than in HD patients. Systolic BP was significantly higher in PD or HD than in predialysis CKD (PD: 138.38 ± 20.97 mmHg; HD: 133.75 ± 15.5 mmHg; CKD: 125.52 ± 13.4 mmHg, p = 0.003), a difference evident also during daytime and nighttime periods. Repeated-measurements ANOVA showed no effect of dialysis modality on ambulatory BP during any period studied. All BPV indices studied were similar between PD and HD patients, in whom they were higher than in CKD individuals (first 24-h systolic-ARV: PD: 11.86 ± 3.19 mmHg; HD: 11.23 ± 3.45 mmHg; CKD: 9.81 ± 2.49 mmHg, p = 0.016). Average BP levels and BPV indices are similar between PD and HD patients, in whom they are higher than in their CKD counterparts. The dialysis modality has no effect on the ambulatory BP profile. These results suggest that PD is no better than HD with regard to overall BP control or BP fluctuations over time.
终末期肾病患者的高血压非常普遍且控制不佳。目前尚无关于腹膜透析(PD)患者动态血压(BP)概况和血压变异性(BPV)的数据。本研究比较了接受PD治疗的患者与血液透析(HD)患者以及透析前慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者的血压概况和BPV。38例PD患者在年龄、性别和透析龄方面与76例HD患者匹配,在年龄和性别方面与38例2-4期CKD患者匹配。接受PD或HD治疗的患者进行48小时动态血压监测,CKD患者进行24小时动态血压监测。比较了48小时、第一个和第二个24小时、白天和夜间时段的血压水平和BPV指数。采用重复测量的双向混合方差分析来评估透析方式和时间对PD和HD患者动态血压的影响。在所有研究时段内,PD患者的收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)数值上高于HD患者,但无显著差异。PD或HD患者的收缩压显著高于透析前CKD患者(PD:138.38±20.97 mmHg;HD:133.75±15.5 mmHg;CKD:125.52±13.4 mmHg,p = 0.003),在白天和夜间时段也有明显差异。重复测量方差分析显示,在任何研究时段内,透析方式对动态血压均无影响。PD和HD患者之间所有研究的BPV指数相似,且高于CKD患者(第一个24小时收缩期-ARV:PD:11.86±3.19 mmHg;HD:11.23±3.45 mmHg;CKD:9.81±2.49 mmHg,p = 0.016)。PD和HD患者的平均血压水平和BPV指数相似,且高于CKD患者。透析方式对动态血压概况无影响。这些结果表明,在总体血压控制或血压随时间波动方面,PD并不优于HD。