Harries Luke, Moore Andrew, Kendall Clare, Stanger Sophie, Stringfellow Thomas D, Davies Andrew, Kelly Mike
Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, England, United Kingdom.
Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, England, United Kingdom.
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2020 Apr 16;11:2151459320916931. doi: 10.1177/2151459320916931. eCollection 2020.
The mortality of patients with neck-of-femur (NOF) fractures remains high, with increasing recognition of a subgroup of patients with predictable mortality. The role of palliative care in this group is poorly understood and underdeveloped. This research aims to investigate current clinician attitudes toward palliative care for patients with NOF fracture, and explore processes in place for early identification for patients nearing the end of life.
An online survey was constructed with reference to National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence end-of-life guidelines (CG13) and distributed to multidisciplinary teams involved in the care of NOF fracture patients in 4 hospitals of contrasting size and location in the United Kingdom.
Forty health-care professionals with a broad range of seniority and roles responded. The palliative care team was felt to have several potential roles in the care of NOF fracture patients, but there was difference of opinion between specialties about what these were. A number of barriers to palliative referral were identified, including stigma and active surgical management. The majority (75%) felt that all NOF fracture patients should have a discussion about ceiling of care, with difference of opinion about who should do so, and when.
As the elderly population has grown, so too has the volume of NOF fracture patients. It is increasingly important to identify and escalate patients who have poor prognosis following hip fracture and ensure they benefit from palliative care where appropriate. This survey demonstrates a barrier to addressing the care of these patients and a lack of consensus on identification and referral to appropriate palliative care planning.
There should be close communication between specialties with regard to requirements for palliative care in NOF fracture patients, with ongoing education and clear local and national guidance to ensure they receive the right care at the right time.
股骨颈骨折患者的死亡率仍然很高,越来越多的人认识到存在一组死亡率可预测的患者。姑息治疗在这一群体中的作用了解甚少且发展不足。本研究旨在调查当前临床医生对股骨颈骨折患者姑息治疗的态度,并探索对接近生命末期患者进行早期识别的现有流程。
参考英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所的临终指南(CG13)构建了一项在线调查,并分发给英国4家规模和地理位置不同的医院中参与股骨颈骨折患者护理的多学科团队。
40名具有广泛资历和角色的医疗保健专业人员做出了回应。姑息治疗团队在股骨颈骨折患者的护理中被认为有几个潜在作用,但不同专业对于这些作用是什么存在意见分歧。确定了一些姑息治疗转诊的障碍,包括耻辱感和积极的手术治疗。大多数人(75%)认为所有股骨颈骨折患者都应该讨论治疗上限,但对于谁应该进行讨论以及何时讨论存在意见分歧。
随着老年人口的增加,股骨颈骨折患者的数量也在增加。识别并转诊髋部骨折后预后不良的患者,并确保他们在适当的时候从姑息治疗中受益变得越来越重要。这项调查表明在解决这些患者的护理方面存在障碍,并且在识别和转诊至适当的姑息治疗计划方面缺乏共识。
各专业之间应就股骨颈骨折患者的姑息治疗要求进行密切沟通,持续开展教育并提供明确的地方和国家指导,以确保他们在正确的时间获得正确的护理。