Siouta Naouma, van Beek Karen, Preston Nancy, Hasselaar Jeroen, Hughes Sean, Payne Sheila, Garralda Eduardo, Centeno Carlos, van der Eerden Marlieke, Groot Marieke, Hodiamont Farina, Radbruch Lukas, Busa Csilla, Csikos Agnes, Menten Johan
Department of Radiation-Oncology and Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium.
International Observatory on End of Life Care, Division of Health Research Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom.
BMC Palliat Care. 2016 Feb 13;15:18. doi: 10.1186/s12904-016-0089-4.
Despite the positive impact of Palliative Care (PC) on the quality of life for patients and their relatives, the implementation of PC in non-cancer health-care delivery in the EU seems scarcely addressed. The aim of this study is to assess guidelines/pathways for integrated PC in patients with advanced Chronic Heart Failure (CHF) and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) in Europe via a systematic literature review.
Search results were screened by two reviewers. Eligible studies of adult patients with CHF or COPD published between 01/01/1995 and 31/12/2013 in Europe in 6 languages were included. Nine electronic databases were searched, 6 journals were hand-searched and citation tracking was also performed. For the analysis, a narrative synthesis was employed.
The search strategy revealed 26,256 studies without duplicates. From these, 19 studies were included in the review; 17 guidelines and 2 pathways. 18 out of 19 focused on suffering reduction interventions, 13/19 on a holistic approach and 15/19 on discussions of illness prognosis and limitations. The involvement of a PC team was mentioned in 13/19 studies, the assessment of the patients' goals of care in 12/19 and the advance care planning in 11/19. Only 4/19 studies elaborated on aspects such as grief and bereavement care, 7/19 on treatment in the last hours of life and 8/19 on the continuation of goal adjustment.
The results illustrate that there is a growing awareness for the importance of integrated PC in patients with advanced CHF or COPD. At the same time, however, they signal the need for the development of standardized strategies so that existing barriers are alleviated.
尽管姑息治疗(PC)对患者及其亲属的生活质量有积极影响,但在欧盟非癌症医疗服务中,PC的实施似乎很少得到关注。本研究的目的是通过系统的文献综述,评估欧洲晚期慢性心力衰竭(CHF)和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者综合PC的指南/路径。
由两名评审员筛选搜索结果。纳入1995年1月1日至2013年12月31日期间在欧洲以6种语言发表的关于CHF或COPD成年患者的合格研究。搜索了9个电子数据库,手工检索了6种期刊,并进行了引文跟踪。分析采用叙述性综合法。
搜索策略显示26256项无重复研究。其中,19项研究纳入综述,包括17项指南和2条路径。19项研究中有18项关注减轻痛苦的干预措施,19项中有13项采用整体方法,19项中有15项讨论疾病预后和局限性。19项研究中有13项提到了PC团队的参与,19项中有12项提到了对患者护理目标的评估,19项中有11项提到了预先护理计划。只有19项研究中的4项阐述了悲伤和丧亲护理等方面,19项中的7项阐述了生命最后时刻的治疗,19项中的8项阐述了目标调整的持续进行。
结果表明,人们越来越意识到晚期CHF或COPD患者综合PC的重要性。然而,与此同时,它们也表明需要制定标准化策略,以消除现有障碍。