Penn Terence M, Overstreet Demario S, Aroke Edwin N, Rumble Deanna D, Sims Andrew M, Kehrer Caroline V, Michl Ava N, Hasan Fariha N, Quinn Tammie L, Long D Leann, Trost Zina, Morris Matthew C, Goodin Burel R
Department of Psychology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Pain Med. 2020 Nov 1;21(11):3161-3171. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnaa095.
For most patients with chronic low back pain (cLBP), the cause is "nonspecific," meaning there is no clear association between pain and identifiable pathology of the spine or associated tissues. Laypersons and providers alike are less inclined to help, feel less sympathy, dislike patients more, suspect deception, and attribute lower pain severity to patients whose pain does not have an objective basis in tissue pathology. Because of these stigmatizing responses from others, patients with cLBP may feel that their pain is particularly unjust and unfair. These pain-related injustice perceptions may subsequently contribute to greater cLBP severity. The purpose of this study was to examine whether perceived injustice helps explain the relationship between chronic pain stigma and movement-evoked pain severity among individuals with cLBP.
Participants included 105 patients with cLBP who completed questionnaires assessing chronic pain stigma and pain-related injustice perception, as well as a short physical performance battery for the assessment of movement-evoked pain and physical function.
Findings revealed that perceived injustice significantly mediated the association between chronic pain stigma and cLBP severity (indirect effect = 6.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.041 to 14.913) and physical function (indirect effect = -0.401, 95% CI = -1.029 to -0.052). Greater chronic pain stigma was associated with greater perceived injustice (P = 0.001), which in turn was associated with greater movement-evoked pain severity (P = 0.003).
These results suggest that perceived injustice may be a means through which chronic pain stigma impacts nonspecific cLBP severity and physical function.
对于大多数慢性下腰痛(cLBP)患者而言,病因是“非特异性的”,这意味着疼痛与脊柱或相关组织的可识别病理之间没有明确关联。外行人和医疗服务提供者都不太愿意提供帮助,同情心较少,更不喜欢患者,怀疑存在欺骗行为,并且认为那些疼痛在组织病理学上没有客观依据的患者疼痛严重程度较低。由于他人的这些污名化反应,cLBP患者可能会觉得自己的疼痛格外不合理且不公平。这些与疼痛相关的不公正认知可能随后会导致cLBP严重程度增加。本研究的目的是检验感知到的不公正是否有助于解释慢性疼痛污名与cLBP患者运动诱发疼痛严重程度之间的关系。
参与者包括105名cLBP患者,他们完成了评估慢性疼痛污名和与疼痛相关的不公正认知的问卷,以及一个简短的身体表现测试,用于评估运动诱发疼痛和身体功能。
研究结果显示,感知到的不公正显著介导了慢性疼痛污名与cLBP严重程度(间接效应 = 6.64,95%置信区间[CI] = 2.041至14.913)以及身体功能(间接效应 = -0.401,95%CI = -1.029至-0.052)之间的关联。更高的慢性疼痛污名与更高的感知到的不公正相关(P = 0.001),而这反过来又与更高的运动诱发疼痛严重程度相关(P = 0.003)。
这些结果表明,感知到的不公正可能是慢性疼痛污名影响非特异性cLBP严重程度和身体功能的一种方式。