Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex.
Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Apr;161(4):1497-1504.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.02.134. Epub 2020 Mar 25.
Comprehensive local consolidative therapy led to improved overall survival in oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer in a recent phase II trial, yet the role of pulmonary resection in ongoing oligometastatic trials is a matter of controversy. We sought to examine outcomes after pulmonary resection with radiotherapy used as a benchmark comparator.
Patients treated at a single institution (2000-2017) with cT1-3N0-2M1 non-small cell lung cancer, 3 or less synchronous metastases, and performance status 0 to 1, and who received comprehensive local consolidative therapy were analyzed according to local consolidative therapy modality for the primary lesion. Progression was analyzed with death as a competing risk.
Of 88 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 63 (71.6%) received radiotherapy for local consolidative therapy modality for the primary lesion and 25 (28.4%) underwent surgery (lobectomy 20/25 [80.0%], pneumonectomy 3/25 [12.0%], sublobar 2/25 [8.0%]). Time from diagnosis to local consolidative therapy modality for the primary lesion was similar. Surgical patients were younger and had lower intrathoracic disease burden. Ninety-day post-treatment mortality was low (surgery 0/25 [0.0%], radiotherapy 1/63 [1.6%]). Median postoperative survival time was 55.2 months (95% confidence interval, 20.1 to not reached), with 1- and 5-year overall survivals of 95.7% and 48.0%, respectively. After radiotherapy, median postoperative survival time was 23.4 months (confidence interval, 17.2-35.9); 1- and 5-year overall survivals were 74.3% and 24.2%, respectively. No differences were observed between modalities in site of first failure, cumulative incidence of locoregional failure (P = .635), or systemic progression (P = .747).
Pulmonary resection is feasible and associated with long-term survival in selected patients with synchronous oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Surgery should remain a local consolidative therapeutic option for patients with operable oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer enrolled in ongoing and future randomized clinical trials.
最近的一项 II 期试验表明,综合局部强化治疗可提高寡转移非小细胞肺癌的总生存率,但在正在进行的寡转移试验中,肺切除术的作用仍存在争议。我们试图通过以放疗作为基准对照来检查肺切除术后的结果。
对 2000 年至 2017 年在一家机构接受治疗的 cT1-3N0-2M1 非小细胞肺癌、3 个或更少同步转移灶和体力状态 0 至 1 的患者,根据原发性病变的局部强化治疗模式进行分析。采用死亡作为竞争风险分析进展情况。
符合纳入标准的 88 例患者中,63 例(71.6%)接受放疗作为原发性病变的局部强化治疗模式,25 例(28.4%)接受手术(肺叶切除术 20/25 [80.0%]、全肺切除术 3/25 [12.0%]、亚肺叶切除术 2/25 [8.0%])。从诊断到原发性病变的局部强化治疗模式的时间相似。手术患者更年轻,且胸腔内疾病负担较低。术后 90 天死亡率较低(手术 0/25 [0.0%],放疗 1/63 [1.6%])。中位术后生存时间为 55.2 个月(95%置信区间,20.1 至未达到),1 年和 5 年总生存率分别为 95.7%和 48.0%。接受放疗后,中位术后生存时间为 23.4 个月(置信区间,17.2-35.9);1 年和 5 年总生存率分别为 74.3%和 24.2%。两种治疗模式在首次失败部位、局部区域失败累积发生率(P =.635)或全身进展方面无差异(P =.747)。
肺切除术在选择的同步寡转移非小细胞肺癌患者中是可行的,并与长期生存相关。对于在进行中和未来的随机临床试验中入组的具有可操作性的寡转移非小细胞肺癌患者,手术仍应作为局部强化治疗的选择。