Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
The Mountain-Whisper-Light Statistics, Seattle, WA, USA.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Oct;29(10):2056-2064. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.01.088. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
The objectives of this study were to address the following questions regarding previous non-arthroplasty surgery prior to primary anatomic shoulder arthroplasty (either total shoulder arthroplasty [TSA] or ream-and-run arthroplasty): (1) To what degree is primary anatomic shoulder arthroplasty after prior non-arthroplasty surgery associated with inferior clinical outcomes and higher revision rates compared with arthroplasty without previous surgery? (2) Does type, approach, or timing of previous surgery affect outcomes after anatomic arthroplasty?
A retrospective review of a primary shoulder arthroplasty database was performed and identified 640 patients undergoing anatomic shoulder arthroplasty (345 TSAs and 295 ream-and-run arthroplasties). Of these patients, 183 (29%) underwent previous non-arthroplasty surgery. Baseline and demographic information, 2-year postoperative outcome scores, and revision surgical procedures with associated culture results were collected.
In patients undergoing TSA, previous non-arthroplasty surgery was associated with a significantly lower 2-year Simple Shoulder Test (SST) score (P = .010), percentage maximum possible improvement (MPI) (P = .024), and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score (P < .001) and a higher rate of reoperation (P < .001). In patients undergoing ream-and-run arthroplasty, previous non-arthroplasty surgery was associated with a nonsignificantly lower 2-year SST score, percentage MPI, and SANE score and higher reoperation rate. Prior fracture surgery carried a higher risk of reoperation than other types of surgery including rotator cuff repair and instability surgery. Among TSA and ream-and-run arthroplasty cases with prior non-arthroplasty surgery, prior open surgery and the time interval from most recent surgery were associated with nonsignificant differences in the 2-year SST score, percentage MPI, SANE score, and revision risk.
Previous surgery is associated with inferior clinical outcomes and higher revision rates in patients undergoing index TSA but not in those undergoing the ream-and-run procedure. Patients with previous fracture surgery carry the highest risk of reoperation.
本研究旨在探讨初次全肩关节置换术(TSA)或再平衡型肩关节置换术前行非关节置换手术的相关问题:(1)初次全肩关节置换术前行非关节置换手术与无既往手术的全肩关节置换术相比,在临床结果和翻修率方面有何差异?(2)既往手术的类型、入路或时机是否影响全肩关节置换术后的结果?
对初次全肩关节置换数据库进行回顾性分析,共纳入 640 例全肩关节置换术患者(345 例 TSA 和 295 例再平衡型肩关节置换术),其中 183 例(29%)患者有非关节置换手术史。收集患者基线和人口统计学资料、术后 2 年的结局评分,以及翻修手术及相关培养结果。
在 TSA 患者中,既往非关节置换手术与术后 2 年的简易肩部测试(SST)评分(P=0.010)、最大可能改善百分比(MPI)(P=0.024)和单评估数字评估(SANE)评分(P<0.001)显著降低和翻修率(P<0.001)较高相关。在再平衡型肩关节置换术患者中,既往非关节置换手术与术后 2 年的 SST 评分、MPI 和 SANE 评分较低和翻修率较高相关,但差异无统计学意义。与其他手术类型(包括肩袖修复和不稳定手术)相比,既往骨折手术的翻修风险更高。在 TSA 和再平衡型肩关节置换术患者中,既往非关节置换手术患者中,既往开放性手术和最近一次手术的时间间隔与术后 2 年的 SST 评分、MPI、SANE 评分和翻修风险差异无统计学意义。
初次全肩关节置换术前的手术史与患者的临床结局较差和翻修率较高相关,但在再平衡型肩关节置换术患者中无此关联。既往骨折手术的患者翻修风险最高。