Suppr超能文献

比较氯氮平使用者与其他抗精神病药使用者的流涎报告模式:使用 VigiBase 进行的药物不良反应比例分析。

Reporting Patterns of Sialorrhea Comparing Users of Clozapine to Users of Other Antipsychotics: A Disproportionality Analysis Using VigiBase.

机构信息

From the Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht.

Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University.

出版信息

J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2020 May/Jun;40(3):283-286. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000001198.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sialorrhea is a non-life-threatening, but potentially invalidating adverse drug reaction (ADR) in patients using clozapine. In light of the very serious ADRs (agranulocytosis and myocarditis), sialorrhea is at risk to be overlooked by health care professionals. In this study, the sialorrhea reporting patterns of clozapine compared with other antipsychotics were assessed by evaluating differences in relative reporting frequency and reporter type.

METHODS

A case/noncase disproportionality analysis using data from VigiBase (1968-2016) was performed. Reports of antipsychotics with "salivary hypersecretion" as ADR were considered as cases, and those with ADRs other than salivary hypersecretion were defined as noncases. Relative reporting frequencies were expressed as reporting odds ratios (RORs), and multivariate logistic regression was performed with the drug-ADR pair as unit of analysis to estimate RORs with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

A total of 1,169,254 drug-ADR pairs from 425,304 unique Individual Case Safety Reports were identified. Sialorrhea was relatively more frequently reported in clozapine (n = 2732 [1.1%]) compared with other antipsychotics (n = 2911 [0.31%]; ROR, 3.60; 95% CI, 3.41-3.79) and was reported relatively more often by consumers (ROR, 19.8; 95% CI, 15.1-25.9) compared with health care professionals (ROR, 2.44; 95% CI, 2.27-2.63).

CONCLUSIONS

Sialorrhea was reported almost 4 times more often with clozapine use than with other antipsychotic use and was reported 8 times more often by patients than by health care professionals. This provides a signal of disproportion in sialorrhea occurrence among clozapine compared with other antipsychotics and in light of the disproportionality between reporter and an underreporting by health care professionals, underlining the importance to incorporate sialorrhea into the shared decision process when commencing clozapine therapy.

摘要

背景

流涎是使用氯氮平的患者一种非危及生命但潜在致残的药物不良反应(ADR)。鉴于非常严重的 ADR(粒细胞缺乏症和心肌炎),卫生保健专业人员有可能忽视流涎。在这项研究中,通过评估相对报告频率和报告者类型的差异,评估了氯氮平与其他抗精神病药的流涎报告模式。

方法

使用 VigiBase(1968-2016 年)中的数据进行病例/非病例不均衡性分析。将报告的具有 ADR“唾液分泌过多”的抗精神病药视为病例,而将具有除唾液分泌过多以外的 ADR 的报告定义为非病例。相对报告频率表示为报告比值比(ROR),并以药物-ADR 对为单位进行多变量逻辑回归,以估计具有 95%置信区间(CI)的 ROR。

结果

共从 425304 个唯一的个体病例安全报告中确定了 1169254 个药物-ADR 对。与其他抗精神病药(n = 2911[0.31%])相比,氯氮平(n = 2732[1.1%])相对更频繁地报告流涎(ROR,3.60;95%CI,3.41-3.79),并且相对更频繁地由消费者报告(ROR,19.8;95%CI,15.1-25.9)而不是卫生保健专业人员报告(ROR,2.44;95%CI,2.27-2.63)。

结论

氯氮平的流涎报告几乎是其他抗精神病药的 4 倍,是卫生保健专业人员报告的 8 倍。这表明氯氮平与其他抗精神病药相比,流涎发生率存在不成比例的信号,并且鉴于报告者与卫生保健专业人员之间的报告不足之间存在不成比例,突出了在开始氯氮平治疗时将流涎纳入共同决策过程的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/115c/7188267/174801626f89/jcp-40-283-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验