Suppr超能文献

急诊科与初级保健的抗生素处方:管理的意义。

Antibiotic prescribing in the emergency department versus primary care: Implications for stewardship.

出版信息

J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2020 Nov-Dec;60(6):789-795.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2020.03.016. Epub 2020 Apr 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study sought to compare the appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing by drug, dose, duration, and indication between the emergency department (ED) and primary care (PC) within the Veterans Affairs Western New York Healthcare System (VAWNYHCS) to aid in focusing antimicrobial stewardship efforts.

DESIGN

In this prospective observational cohort study, patients were identified using electronic alerts at the time of antibiotic prescribing. Prescriptions were retrospectively analyzed for appropriateness of antibiotic indication, drug choice, dose, and duration on the basis of current guideline recommendations. Data were compared between the ED and PC to determine the impact of visit location on prescribing habits. Baseline characteristics were compared using descriptive statistics, and a multivariable analysis was performed to identify statistically significant risk factors for inappropriate prescribing.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Patients prescribed outpatient antibiotics at the VAWNYHCS ED and PC settings between June 2017 and February 2018.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing by drug, dose, duration, and indication between the ED and PC settings.

RESULTS

The cohort included 1566 antibiotic prescriptions (ED = 488, PC = 1078). The appropriate drug, dose, and duration for antibiotics prescribed in the ED versus PC were 63.1% versus 43.4% (P < 0.001), 88.1% versus 88.2% (P = 0.953), and 86.1% versus 71.1% (P < 0.001), respectively. Azithromycin was the most inappropriately prescribed antibiotic in both the ED (37.8%) and PC (49.0%). Two factors predicted whether patients received the correct antibiotic empirically: location of the visit and antibiotic allergy. Overall, 56.6% of ED prescriptions and 82% of PC prescriptions were inappropriate with respect to at least 1 component.

CONCLUSION

Stewardship is needed in both the ED and PC settings. However, initial efforts should be focused on PC because this setting had a statistically significant amount of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing. Pharmacist-led education and interventions should focus on the determination of drug, duration, and indication for the use of antibiotics.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较退伍军人事务部西部纽约医疗保健系统(VAWNYHCS)内急诊科(ED)和初级保健(PC)之间药物、剂量、持续时间和适应证的抗生素处方的适宜性,以帮助集中进行抗菌药物管理。

设计

在这项前瞻性观察队列研究中,在开具抗生素时通过电子警报识别患者。根据当前指南建议,回顾性分析处方的抗生素适应证、药物选择、剂量和持续时间的适宜性。比较 ED 和 PC 之间的数据,以确定就诊地点对处方习惯的影响。使用描述性统计比较基线特征,并进行多变量分析以确定不适当处方的统计学显著风险因素。

地点和参与者

2017 年 6 月至 2018 年 2 月期间在 VAWNYHCS ED 和 PC 环境中开处门诊抗生素的患者。

观察指标

ED 和 PC 环境下抗生素药物、剂量、持续时间和适应证的适宜性。

结果

该队列包括 1566 份抗生素处方(ED=488,PC=1078)。ED 与 PC 相比,抗生素的适当药物、剂量和持续时间分别为 63.1%与 43.4%(P<0.001)、88.1%与 88.2%(P=0.953)和 86.1%与 71.1%(P<0.001)。阿奇霉素在 ED(37.8%)和 PC(49.0%)中都是最不适当的处方抗生素。有两个因素预测了患者是否接受了正确的经验性抗生素治疗:就诊地点和抗生素过敏。总体而言,56.6%的 ED 处方和 82%的 PC 处方在至少一个方面是不适当的。

结论

ED 和 PC 环境都需要管理。然而,最初的努力应该集中在 PC,因为这个环境中存在大量不适当的抗生素处方。药剂师主导的教育和干预措施应侧重于确定抗生素的使用药物、持续时间和适应证。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验