• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

智能高速公路与传统高速公路:在实际交通条件下的环境影响评估。

Smart vs conventional motorways: Environmental impact assessment under realistic traffic conditions.

机构信息

DICAM, University of Trento, Italy.

Department of Engineering, University of Palermo, Italy.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2020 Jul 20;727:138521. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138521. Epub 2020 Apr 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138521
PMID:32335451
Abstract

This research aims at assessing the environmental impacts exerted by a smart motorway compared to those of a traditional motorway. The study has global policy implications: it takes into account the impacts due to the construction and maintenance of the infrastructure and the environmental effects produced by the traffic emissions, taking into account smart technologies and truck platooning regulation. Through a classical LCA approach, 1 km-long smart motorway with 2 m-high embankment was assumed as the functional unit for the analysis. A realistic traffic condition has been considered. A comparison between environmental effects produced by the use of virgin material and by Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement was made by assuming two maintenance plans. Thanks to C-ITS systems the greater safety featured by smart motorways has a significant effect on the environmental impact, compared to conventional motorways. The impact produced by safety barriers during the life cycle was also estimated. For smart motorways the impact categories GWP, POCP, AP and EP are observed to be considerably reduced in the maintenance phase of zinc-coated steel safety barriers and in those associated to traffic emissions. It must be noted that in smart motorways vehicle emissions are markedly influenced by the percentage of heavy vehicles travelling in Truck Platooning mode. The results show that concomitant use of lime stabilization and RAP leads to a significant reduction in energy consumption (up to 35%) and pollutant emissions (up to 34% of CO) than in case of exclusive use of virgin material. The accidents reduction produce a 30% decrease of GWP, POCP, AP and EP related to safety barriers maintenance phase than the corresponding values of traditional motorway. Truck platooning mode generates GWP reduction close to 4%. The environmental advantages of a smart motorway increase progressively with the increase of AADT, platooning truck percentage and heavy vehicles percentage.

摘要

本研究旨在评估智能高速公路相对于传统高速公路所产生的环境影响。该研究具有全球政策意义:它考虑了基础设施建设和维护的影响,以及考虑了智能技术和卡车队列调节的交通排放所产生的环境影响。通过经典的生命周期评估方法,假设 1 公里长、2 米高路堤的智能高速公路作为分析的功能单元。考虑了实际的交通状况。通过假设两种维护计划,比较了使用原生材料和再生沥青路面产生的环境影响。由于 C-ITS 系统,智能高速公路的更高安全性对环境影响具有显著影响,与传统高速公路相比。还估计了生命周期中安全护栏产生的影响。对于智能高速公路,在镀锌钢安全护栏的维护阶段以及与交通排放相关的阶段,GWP、POCP、AP 和 EP 的影响类别观察到明显减少。必须注意的是,在智能高速公路上,车辆排放受到以卡车队列模式行驶的重型车辆的百分比的显著影响。结果表明,石灰稳定和 RAP 的共同使用导致能源消耗(高达 35%)和污染物排放(高达 34%的 CO)显著减少,而与单独使用原生材料的情况相比。事故减少导致与传统高速公路相比,安全护栏维护阶段的 GWP、POCP、AP 和 EP 相关的减少了 30%。卡车队列模式产生的 GWP 减少接近 4%。智能高速公路的环境优势随着 AADT、队列卡车百分比和重型车辆百分比的增加而逐步增加。

相似文献

1
Smart vs conventional motorways: Environmental impact assessment under realistic traffic conditions.智能高速公路与传统高速公路:在实际交通条件下的环境影响评估。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Jul 20;727:138521. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138521. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
2
Truck platooning reshapes greenhouse gas emissions of the integrated vehicle-road infrastructure system.卡车编队行驶重塑了车辆-道路综合基础设施系统的温室气体排放情况。
Nat Commun. 2023 Aug 15;14(1):4495. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-40116-0.
3
Relationship between crash rate and hourly traffic flow on interurban motorways.城市间高速公路上碰撞率与每小时交通流量之间的关系。
Accid Anal Prev. 2002 Sep;34(5):619-29. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(01)00061-6.
4
Combined acoustical and visual performance of noise barriers in mitigating the environmental impact of motorways.高速公路噪声屏障的声学和视觉性能综合减轻环境影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Feb 1;543(Pt A):52-60. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.010. Epub 2015 Nov 13.
5
Use of n-fold cross-validation to evaluate three methods to calculate heavy truck annual average daily traffic and vehicle miles traveled.使用n折交叉验证来评估三种计算重型卡车年平均日交通量和车辆行驶里程的方法。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2007 Jan;57(1):4-13. doi: 10.1080/10473289.2007.10465292.
6
Life-LCA: case study of the life cycle impacts of an infant.生命周期评估:一名婴儿生命周期影响的案例研究。
Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2023;28(3):291-303. doi: 10.1007/s11367-022-02129-7. Epub 2023 Jan 14.
7
Reduced NOx and PM10 emissions on urban motorways in The Netherlands by 80 km/h speed management.通过限速 80 公里/小时管理,减少荷兰城市高速公路上的氮氧化物和 PM10 排放。
Sci Total Environ. 2010 May 15;408(12):2517-26. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.03.008. Epub 2010 Mar 30.
8
Investigating the influence on safety of retrofitting Italian motorways with barriers meeting a new EU standard.调查用符合欧盟新标准的护栏改造意大利高速公路对安全性的影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2017 Apr 3;18(3):324-329. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2016.1203424. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
9
A life cycle scenario analysis of different pavement technologies for urban roads.城市道路不同路面技术的生命周期情景分析。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Jul 10;673:585-593. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.046. Epub 2019 Apr 5.
10
Energy Consumption and Environment Performance Analysis of Induction-Healed Asphalt Pavement by Life Cycle Assessment (LCA).基于生命周期评价(LCA)的感应加热修复沥青路面能耗与环境性能分析
Materials (Basel). 2021 Mar 5;14(5):1244. doi: 10.3390/ma14051244.