• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在网络搜索引擎和人工智能之间:实验室测试中展示了哪一面?

Between Web search engines and artificial intelligence: what side is shown in laboratory tests?

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine, University-Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy.

Department of Laboratory Medicine, University-Hospital of Padova, via Giustiniani 2, Padova 35128, Italy.

出版信息

Diagnosis (Berl). 2020 Apr 25;8(2):227-232. doi: 10.1515/dx-2020-0022. Print 2021 May 26.

DOI:10.1515/dx-2020-0022
PMID:32335539
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The number of websites providing laboratory test information is increasing fast, although the accuracy of reported resources is sometimes questionable. The aim of this study was to assess the quality of online retrievable information by Google Search engine.

METHODS

Considering urinalysis, cholesterol and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) as keywords, the Google Search engine was queried. Using Google Trends, users' search trends (interest over time) were evaluated in a 5-year period. The first three or 10 retrieved hits were analysed in blind by two reviewers and classified according to the type of owner or publisher and for the quality of the reported Web content.

RESULTS

The interest over time constantly increased for all the three considered tests. Most of the Web content owners were editorial and/or publishing groups (mean percentage 35.5% and 30.0% for the first three and 10 hits, respectively). Public and health agencies and scientific societies are less represented. Among the first three and 10 hits, cited sources were found to vary from 26.0% to 46.7% of Web page results, whilst for cholesterol, 60% of the retrieved Web contents reported only authors' signatures.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings confirm those obtained in other studies in the literature, demonstrating that online Web searches can lead patients to inadequately written or reviewed health information.

摘要

背景

提供实验室检测信息的网站数量增长迅速,尽管所报道资源的准确性有时值得怀疑。本研究旨在评估谷歌搜索引擎在线可检索信息的质量。

方法

以尿分析、胆固醇和前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)为关键词,使用谷歌搜索引擎进行检索。利用谷歌趋势,评估了 5 年内用户的搜索趋势(随时间的兴趣变化)。由两名评审员对前三个或前 10 个检索结果进行盲法分析,并根据所有者或出版商的类型以及报告的网络内容质量进行分类。

结果

所有三种检测的随时间的兴趣都在不断增加。大多数网络内容的所有者是编辑和/或出版团体(前三个和前 10 个检索结果的平均百分比分别为 35.5%和 30.0%)。公共和卫生机构以及科学协会的代表性较少。在前三个和前 10 个检索结果中,发现引用的来源从网页结果的 26.0%到 46.7%不等,而对于胆固醇,检索到的 60%的网络内容仅报告了作者的签名。

结论

我们的研究结果证实了文献中其他研究的结果,表明在线网络搜索可能会导致患者获取到写作质量较差或未经审查的健康信息。

相似文献

1
Between Web search engines and artificial intelligence: what side is shown in laboratory tests?在网络搜索引擎和人工智能之间:实验室测试中展示了哪一面?
Diagnosis (Berl). 2020 Apr 25;8(2):227-232. doi: 10.1515/dx-2020-0022. Print 2021 May 26.
2
The impact of search engine selection and sorting criteria on vaccination beliefs and attitudes: two experiments manipulating Google output.搜索引擎选择和排序标准对疫苗接种观念及态度的影响:两项操纵谷歌搜索结果的实验
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Apr 2;16(4):e100. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2642.
3
Search Engines and Generative Artificial Intelligence Integration: Public Health Risks and Recommendations to Safeguard Consumers Online.搜索引擎与生成式人工智能整合:保障在线消费者安全的公共健康风险与建议。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Mar 21;10:e53086. doi: 10.2196/53086.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Assessing the quality, reliability and readability of online health information regarding systemic lupus erythematosus.评估关于系统性红斑狼疮的在线健康信息的质量、可靠性和可读性。
Lupus. 2018 Oct;27(12):1911-1917. doi: 10.1177/0961203318793213. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
6
Google Versus PubMed: Comparison of Google and PubMed's Search Tools for Answering Clinical Questions in the Emergency Department.谷歌与 PubMed 的比较:在急诊科回答临床问题时,谷歌和 PubMed 的搜索工具的比较。
Ann Emerg Med. 2020 Mar;75(3):408-415. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.07.003. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
7
Googling Allergy in Ireland: Content Analysis.在爱尔兰搜索过敏信息:内容分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 13;22(5):e16763. doi: 10.2196/16763.
8
What do patients know about their low back pain? An analysis of the quality of information available on the Internet.患者对其腰痛了解多少?对互联网上可得信息质量的分析。
Technol Health Care. 2012;20(6):447-55. doi: 10.3233/THC-2012-0682.
9
The sources and popularity of online drug information: an analysis of top search engine results and web page views.在线药物信息的来源和流行度:对顶级搜索引擎结果和网页浏览量的分析。
Ann Pharmacother. 2011 Mar;45(3):350-6. doi: 10.1345/aph.1P572. Epub 2011 Feb 22.
10
The Darknet and suicide.暗网与自杀。
J Affect Disord. 2018 Dec 1;241:127-132. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.08.028. Epub 2018 Aug 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Bringing the clinical laboratory into the strategy to advance diagnostic excellence.将临床实验室纳入推进诊断卓越的策略中。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2021 Jan 6;8(3):281-294. doi: 10.1515/dx-2020-0119. Print 2021 Aug 26.
2
Machine Learning Model Comparison in the Screening of Cholangiocarcinoma Using Plasma Bile Acids Profiles.基于血浆胆汁酸谱的胆管癌筛查中机器学习模型的比较
Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 Aug 2;10(8):551. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10080551.