Department of Urology and Urological Oncology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Second Department of Urology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.
J Endourol. 2020 Aug;34(8):795-804. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0301. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
T1, high-grade, nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is characterized by a high recurrence rate and progression to muscle-invasive disease concerns a significant number of patients. To overcome limitations of initial transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT), various strategies are proposed in the literature. One of them is performance of restaging TURBT (re-TURBT). In recent years, it has been shown that re-TURBT can provide valuable additional pathologic information. However, its potential effect on survival improvement is debatable and benefits from this procedure have been suggested to be dependent on several clinicopathological factors (e.g., the presence of detrusor muscle in initial TURBT). A systematic search was conducted within the three electronic databases, including Medline, Scopus, and Embase. The following outcomes were retrieved: outcome measurements of recurrence-free survival (RFS), progression-free survival (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS), including hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Initially, a main analysis for each outcome (RFS, PFS, CSS, and OS) was performed. Subsequently, we conducted subgroup analyses for the following factors: T1 grade, presence of detrusor muscle in initial TURBT, and type of adjuvant intravesical therapy. Finally, six studies with overall 3257 participants were identified for this meta-analysis. A significant impact of re-TURBT on RFS, PFS, CSS, and OS was not found in the overall analysis that included all patients with T1 bladder tumors. On the other hand, subgroup analyses, including studies reporting cohorts with mixed T1 tumor grading, revealed that re-TURBT was associated with significantly better RFS, PFS, and OS. This meta-analysis shows that re-TURBT does not improve survival outcomes in patients with T1 tumors; however, results of some particular subgroup analyses indicate its potential positive impact on the subsequent course of the disease. Furthermore, high-quality, prospective, randomized controlled trials are necessary to make a final statement about the therapeutic role of re-TURBT in T1 NMIBC.
T1 级、高级别、非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)的特点是复发率高,并且进展为肌肉浸润性疾病会使相当数量的患者感到担忧。为了克服初始经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术(TURBT)的局限性,文献中提出了各种策略。其中之一是进行重新分期 TURBT(re-TURBT)。近年来,已经表明 re-TURBT 可以提供有价值的附加病理信息。然而,其对生存改善的潜在影响存在争议,并且认为这种手术的益处取决于几个临床病理因素(例如,在初始 TURBT 中存在逼尿肌)。在三个电子数据库中进行了系统搜索,包括 Medline、Scopus 和 Embase。检索到以下结果:无复发生存率(RFS)、无进展生存率(PFS)、癌症特异性生存率(CSS)和总生存率(OS)的结局测量,包括危险比和 95%置信区间。最初,对每个结局(RFS、PFS、CSS 和 OS)进行了主要分析。随后,我们对以下因素进行了亚组分析:T1 分级、初始 TURBT 中逼尿肌的存在以及膀胱内辅助治疗的类型。最后,对这项荟萃分析共纳入了 6 项研究,共 3257 名参与者。在包括所有 T1 膀胱癌患者的总体分析中,未发现 re-TURBT 对 RFS、PFS、CSS 和 OS 有显著影响。另一方面,包括报告混合 T1 肿瘤分级队列的研究的亚组分析表明,re-TURBT 与 RFS、PFS 和 OS 的显著改善相关。这项荟萃分析表明,re-TURBT 并不能改善 T1 肿瘤患者的生存结局;然而,一些特定亚组分析的结果表明,它对疾病的后续过程可能有积极影响。此外,需要进行高质量、前瞻性、随机对照试验,才能对 re-TURBT 在 T1NMIBC 中的治疗作用做出最终结论。