University of California, Irvine, USA.
New York University, New York City, USA.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2021 Jan;47(1):42-56. doi: 10.1177/0146167220914116. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
"Theory of Mind" (ToM; people's ability to infer and use information about others' mental states) varies across cultures. In four studies ( = 881), including two preregistered replications, we show that social class predicts performance on ToM tasks. In Studies 1A and 1B, we provide new evidence for a relationship between social class and emotion perception: Higher-class individuals performed more poorly than their lower-class counterparts on the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test, which has participants infer the emotional states of targets from images of their eyes. In Studies 2A and 2B, we provide the first evidence that social class predicts visual perspective taking: Higher-class individuals made more errors than lower-class individuals in the Director Task, which requires participants to assume the visual perspective of another person. Potential mechanisms linking social class to performance in different ToM domains, as well as implications for deficiency-centered perspectives on low social class, are discussed.
“心理理论”(ToM;人们推断和利用他人心理状态信息的能力)在不同文化中存在差异。在四项研究(共 881 人)中,包括两项预先注册的重复研究,我们表明社会阶层预测了 ToM 任务的表现。在研究 1A 和 1B 中,我们提供了社会阶层和情绪感知之间关系的新证据:与低社会阶层相比,高社会阶层个体在“读心术眼测试”(Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test)中表现更差,该测试要求参与者从目标的眼睛图像中推断出他们的情绪状态。在研究 2A 和 2B 中,我们提供了第一个证据,表明社会阶层预测了视觉视角:在“导演任务”(Director Task)中,高社会阶层个体比低社会阶层个体犯的错误更多,该任务要求参与者假设另一个人的视觉视角。讨论了将社会阶层与不同 ToM 领域表现联系起来的潜在机制,以及对低社会阶层缺陷中心观点的影响。