D'Alessandro A M, D'Andrea G, Oratore A
Department of Biomedical Sciences and Technologies, University of L'Aquila, Italy.
Electrophoresis. 1988 Feb;9(2):80-3. doi: 10.1002/elps.1150090204.
Isoelectric focusing (IEF) of human serum transferrin allows splitting of the protein pattern into three forms corresponding to the diferric, monoferric and apoform. A detailed analysis of this pattern, performed on transferrin at different degrees of iron saturation, demonstrated that free Ampholine carrier ampholytes (CA) alter the expected results, always giving a complex pattern with multiple bands. In particular, the monoferric form appears to be the predominant one, regardless of the starting saturation of transferrin. In contrast to IEF-CA, the new technique of IEF in immobilized pH gradients (IPG), shows a much simpler pattern with the same samples. Moreover, the different transferrin forms are focused at the same pI values as in IEF-CA but the pattern appears to correspond to the expected distribution. IPG analysis gives a pattern similar to IEF-CA when free Ampholine CA are added either to the samples and/or as electrode solutions. A chelating action of Ampholine CA on Fe+3 might be responsible for these effects, while Immobilines, due to their different chemical nature or to the different focusing procedure, are not able to interact with iron.
人血清转铁蛋白的等电聚焦(IEF)可将蛋白质图谱分为三种形式,分别对应双铁、单铁和脱铁形式。对不同铁饱和度的转铁蛋白进行的该图谱详细分析表明,游离的两性电解质载体两性电解质(CA)会改变预期结果,总是产生具有多条带的复杂图谱。特别是,无论转铁蛋白的起始饱和度如何,单铁形式似乎都是主要形式。与IEF-CA不同,固定化pH梯度(IPG)中的IEF新技术对相同样品显示出简单得多的图谱。此外,不同的转铁蛋白形式聚焦于与IEF-CA相同的pI值,但图谱似乎与预期分布相对应。当将游离的两性电解质CA添加到样品中或用作电极溶液时,IPG分析给出的图谱与IEF-CA相似。两性电解质CA对Fe+3的螯合作用可能是造成这些影响的原因,而固定化电解质由于其不同的化学性质或不同的聚焦过程,无法与铁相互作用。