• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

虚假健康声称:进一步考虑情绪的作用。

Fraudulent health claims: Further consideration of the role of emotions.

机构信息

University of Connecticut, USA.

University of Connecticut, USA.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2020 Aug;259:112979. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112979. Epub 2020 Apr 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112979
PMID:32345448
Abstract

In order to combat fraudulent health claims, MacFarlane, Hurlstone, and Ecker (2020) have proposed a taxonomy intended to establish factors that increase susceptibility to such messages. We expand upon the work of MacFarlane and colleagues by highlighting the role of emotions in attitude change, and elaborate upon how emotions may increase susceptibility to fraudulent health messaging. We assert that to produce lasting and persistent attitude change, emotion needs to be incorporated into health care fraud interventions, as well as factual information. We concur with MacFarlane and colleagues that fraudulent health claims are a pressing issue with deleterious consequences, and supplement their work by enumerating the importance of emotion in promoting attitude and behavior change.

摘要

为了打击虚假健康声明,MacFarlane、Hurlstone 和 Ecker(2020)提出了一个分类法,旨在确定增加对这些信息易感性的因素。我们通过强调情绪在态度改变中的作用,并详细说明情绪如何增加对欺诈性健康信息的易感性,对 MacFarlane 及其同事的工作进行了扩展。我们断言,为了产生持久和持续的态度改变,需要将情感融入医疗保健欺诈干预措施以及事实信息中。我们同意 MacFarlane 及其同事的观点,即虚假健康声明是一个具有破坏性后果的紧迫问题,并通过列举情绪在促进态度和行为改变方面的重要性来补充他们的工作。

相似文献

1
Fraudulent health claims: Further consideration of the role of emotions.虚假健康声称:进一步考虑情绪的作用。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Aug;259:112979. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112979. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
2
The jigsaw puzzle of fraudulent health claims: Missing psychological pieces.虚假健康声明的拼图:缺失的心理板块。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Aug;259:112818. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112818. Epub 2020 Feb 1.
3
Protecting consumers from fraudulent health claims: A taxonomy of psychological drivers, interventions, barriers, and treatments.保护消费者免受欺诈性健康声明的影响:心理驱动因素、干预措施、障碍和治疗方法的分类。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Aug;259:112790. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112790. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
4
Research on the risk governance of fraudulent reimbursement of patient consultation fees.患者就诊费用欺诈性报销的风险治理研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Feb 12;12:1339177. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1339177. eCollection 2024.
5
The evaluation of trustworthiness to identify health insurance fraud in dentistry.评估可信度以识别牙科医疗保险欺诈行为。
Artif Intell Med. 2017 Jan;75:40-50. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2016.12.002. Epub 2016 Dec 27.
6
Using data mining to find fraud in HCFA health care claims.利用数据挖掘技术查找医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心医疗保健索赔中的欺诈行为。
Top Health Inf Manage. 2001 Aug;22(1):1-13.
7
The need to combat clinical fraud.打击临床欺诈行为的必要性。
Nurs Stand. 2002;16(36):39-42. doi: 10.7748/ns2002.05.16.36.39.c3198.
8
[Fraud in the health systems of Chile: a detection model].[智利医疗系统中的欺诈行为:一种检测模型]
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2009 Jan;25(1):56-61. doi: 10.1590/s1020-49892009000100009.
9
Fraudulent claims of combat status in the VA?美国退伍军人事务部(VA)中关于战斗状态的欺诈性索赔?
Psychiatr Serv. 2002 Mar;53(3):345. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.53.3.345.
10
Kickbacks, self-referrals, and false claims: the hazy boundaries of health-care fraud.回扣、自我推荐和虚假索赔:医疗保健欺诈的模糊界限。
Chest. 2013 Sep;144(3):1045-1050. doi: 10.1378/chest.12-2889.

引用本文的文献

1
Better safe than sorry: a study on older adults' credibility judgments and spreading of health misinformation.宁可事先谨慎有余,不要事后追悔莫及:一项关于老年人对健康错误信息的可信度判断及传播的研究。
Univers Access Inf Soc. 2022 Aug 4:1-10. doi: 10.1007/s10209-022-00899-3.