Mathew Rosen Roy, Raju Krishnaprabhu, Nair Bijesh Ravindran, Mariappan Ramamani
Department of Anaesthesia, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Department of Neurological Sciences, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Indian J Anaesth. 2020 Mar;64(3):222-229. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_625_19. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
Anticonvulsants are used routinely for seizure prophylaxis in patients with supratentorial tumour who present with/without seizures. Excessive use of prophylactic anticonvulsant may delay the recovery from anaesthesia. We have studied the recovery profiles of patients who received an additional dose of anticonvulsant in comparison with those who received only the regular dose.
In this prospective observational study, patients were anaesthetised using standard anaesthesia protocol. An additional dose of anticonvulsant was administered in one group, while the other group received only the regular dose. Time taken for extubation, eye opening, obeying commands and orientation were compared between the two groups. Haemodynamics, depth of anaesthesia, the plasma anticonvulsant levels and the incidence of seizures were compared between the two groups.
A total of 36 patients were studied, of which 19 received regular dose and 17 received an additional dose. There was no significant difference in recovery time between the two groups. Subgroup analysis was performed for phenytoin and sodium valproate. There was a clinically significant delay in recovery in patients who received an additional phenytoin compared to those who received regular dose (time to obey commands >15 min and orientation time >1hour) but, it was not statistically significant. Administration of an additional dose of valproate did not prolong the recovery time.
An additional dose of sodium valproate did not cause a delay in recovery both, clinically and statistically. However, the administration of an additional dose of phenytoin caused a clinically significant delay in recovery but was not statistically significant.
对于患有幕上肿瘤且有/无癫痫发作的患者,抗惊厥药物通常用于预防癫痫发作。预防性抗惊厥药物的过度使用可能会延迟麻醉后的恢复。我们比较了接受额外剂量抗惊厥药物的患者与仅接受常规剂量患者的恢复情况。
在这项前瞻性观察研究中,患者采用标准麻醉方案进行麻醉。一组给予额外剂量的抗惊厥药物,另一组仅接受常规剂量。比较两组患者拔管、睁眼、听从指令和定向所需的时间。比较两组患者的血流动力学、麻醉深度、血浆抗惊厥药物水平和癫痫发作发生率。
共研究了36例患者,其中19例接受常规剂量,17例接受额外剂量。两组之间的恢复时间没有显著差异。对苯妥英钠和丙戊酸钠进行了亚组分析。与接受常规剂量的患者相比,接受额外苯妥英钠的患者恢复时间有临床显著延迟(听从指令时间>15分钟,定向时间>1小时),但无统计学意义。额外剂量的丙戊酸钠给药并未延长恢复时间。
额外剂量的丙戊酸钠在临床和统计学上均未导致恢复延迟。然而,额外剂量的苯妥英钠给药在临床上导致恢复有显著延迟,但无统计学意义。