Ross D S, Liu B, Schram A M, Razavi P, Lagana S M, Zhang Y, Scaltriti M, Bromberg J F, Ladanyi M, Hyman D M, Drilon A, Zehir A, Benayed R, Chandarlapaty S, Hechtman J F
Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program.
Ann Oncol. 2020 Aug;31(8):991-1000. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.04.008. Epub 2020 Apr 26.
Kinase fusions are rare and poorly characterized in breast cancer (BC). We aimed to characterize kinase fusions within a large cohort of advanced BC.
A total of 4854 patients with BC were analyzed by Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets (MSK-IMPACT) targeted DNAseq and MSK-Fusion targeted RNAseq during the study time period.
Twenty-seven of 4854 (0.6%) patients harbored fusions: 11 FGFR (five FGFR2, three FGFR3, three FGFR1), five BRAF, four NTRK1, two RET, two ROS1, one ALK, one ERBB2, and one MET. A history of endocrine therapy was present in 15 (56%) of fusion-positive BC; eight of the 15 cases had available pre-treatment samples, of which six were fusion-negative. None of the fusion-positive BC samples harbored ESR1 hotspot mutations. Two patients with acquired LMNA-NTRK1 fusions and metastatic disease received larotrectinib and demonstrated clinical benefit.
Kinase fusions in BC are extremely rare, and appear to be enriched in hormone-resistant, metastatic carcinomas and mutually exclusive with ESR1 mutations. The present study expands the spectrum of genetic alterations activating mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling that can substitute for ESR1 mutations in this setting. Molecular testing at progression after endocrine therapy should include fusion testing, particularly in the absence of ESR1 hotspot alterations, in an effort to identify additional therapeutic options which may provide substantial clinical benefit.
激酶融合在乳腺癌(BC)中罕见且特征不明。我们旨在对一大群晚期BC患者中的激酶融合进行特征分析。
在研究期间,通过纪念斯隆凯特琳癌症中心可操作癌症靶点综合突变分析(MSK-IMPACT)靶向DNA测序和MSK-融合靶向RNA测序对总共4854例BC患者进行了分析。
4854例患者中有27例(0.6%)存在融合:11例FGFR(5例FGFR2、3例FGFR3、3例FGFR1)、5例BRAF、4例NTRK1、2例RET、2例ROS1、1例ALK、1例ERBB2和1例MET。15例(56%)融合阳性BC患者有内分泌治疗史;15例中的8例有治疗前样本,其中6例为融合阴性。融合阳性BC样本均未携带ESR1热点突变。2例获得性LMNA-NTRK1融合且有转移性疾病的患者接受了拉罗替尼治疗并显示出临床获益。
BC中的激酶融合极为罕见,似乎在激素抵抗性转移性癌中富集,且与ESR1突变相互排斥。本研究扩展了在此情况下可替代ESR1突变的激活丝裂原活化蛋白激酶(MAPK)信号传导的基因改变谱。内分泌治疗进展时的分子检测应包括融合检测,特别是在没有ESR1热点改变的情况下,以努力识别可能提供显著临床获益的其他治疗选择。