Suppr超能文献

二维剪切波弹性成像与瞬时弹性成像技术对诊断中晚期慢性肝脏疾病的价值比较

Agreement Between 2-Dimensional Shear Wave and Transient Elastography Values for Diagnosis of Advanced Chronic Liver Disease.

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Saint-Eloi Hospital, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France; IMAG, CNRS, Montpellier University, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France.

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, University Hospital of Bordeaux, Pessac, France.

出版信息

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Dec;18(13):2971-2979.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.04.034. Epub 2020 Apr 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Inter-platform variation in liver stiffness evaluation (LSE) could hinder dissemination and clinical implementation of new ultrasound methods. We aimed to determine whether measurements of liver stiffness by bi-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) with a Supersonic Imagine apparatus are comparable to those made by vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE).

METHODS

We collected data from 1219 consecutive patients with chronic liver disease who underwent LSE by VCTE and 2D-SWE (performed by blinded operators), on the same day, at a single center in France from September 2011 through June 2019. We assessed the ability of liver stiffness value distributions and 2D-SWE performances to identify patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) according to the Baveno VI criteria, based on VCTE cut-off values.

RESULTS

VCTE and 2D-SWE values correlated (Pearson's correlation coefficient, 0.882; P < .0001; Lin concordance coefficient, 0.846; P < .0001). The median stiffness values were 6.7 kPa with VCTE (interquartile range, 4.8-11.6 kPa) and 7.1 kPa with 2D-SWE (interquartile range, 5.4-11.1 kPa) (P = .736). 2D-SWE values were slightly higher in the low percentiles and lower in the high percentiles; the best match with VCTE values were at approximately 7-9 kPa. The area under the curve of 2D-SWE for identifying of VCTE values below 10 was 0.964 (95% CI, 0.952-0.976) and for VCTE values above 15 kPa was 0.976 (95% CI, 0.963-0.988), with Youden index-associated cut-off values of 9.5 and 13kPa and best accuracy cut-off values of 10 kPa and 14 kPa, respectively. A 2D-SWE cut-off value of 10 kPa detected VCTE values below 10k Pa with 92% sensitivity, 87% specificity, and 91% accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

Measurement of liver stiffness by VCTE or 2D-SWE produces comparable results. 2D-SWE accurately identifies patients with cACLD according to the Baveno VI criteria based on VCTE cut-off values. A 10 kPa 2D-SWE cut-off value can be used to rule out cACLD.

摘要

背景与目的

肝硬度评估(LSE)在不同平台上的差异可能会阻碍新超声方法的传播和临床应用。本研究旨在确定二维剪切波弹性成像(2D-SWE)与超声瞬时弹性成像(VCTE)测量肝硬度的结果是否具有可比性。

方法

我们收集了 2011 年 9 月至 2019 年 6 月在法国某单一中心连续接受 VCTE 和 2D-SWE(由盲法操作员进行)的 1219 例慢性肝病患者的数据。我们根据 VCTE 截断值,评估了肝硬度值分布和 2D-SWE 性能在识别根据 Baveno VI 标准诊断为代偿性晚期慢性肝病(cACLD)患者方面的能力。

结果

VCTE 和 2D-SWE 值呈正相关(Pearson 相关系数为 0.882;P<0.0001;Lin 一致性系数为 0.846;P<0.0001)。VCTE 中位数为 6.7kPa(四分位间距为 4.8-11.6kPa),2D-SWE 中位数为 7.1kPa(四分位间距为 5.4-11.1kPa)(P=0.736)。2D-SWE 在低值范围稍高,在高值范围稍低;与 VCTE 值最匹配的范围约为 7-9kPa。2D-SWE 对 VCTE 值低于 10kPa 的曲线下面积为 0.964(95%CI,0.952-0.976),对 VCTE 值高于 15kPa 的曲线下面积为 0.976(95%CI,0.963-0.988),对应的约登指数截断值为 9.5kPa 和 13kPa,最佳准确性截断值为 10kPa 和 14kPa。2D-SWE 截断值为 10kPa 时,对 VCTE 值低于 10kPa 的患者的敏感性为 92%,特异性为 87%,准确性为 91%。

结论

VCTE 或 2D-SWE 测量肝硬度的结果具有可比性。2D-SWE 可根据 VCTE 截断值准确识别符合 Baveno VI 标准的 cACLD 患者。2D-SWE 截断值为 10kPa 可用于排除 cACLD。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验