Langford Veterinary Services, Small Animal Hospital, University of Bristol, Langford, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Fitzpatrick Referrals Orthopaedics and Neurology, Eashing, Godalming, United Kingdom.
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2020 Jul;33(4):294-300. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1708522. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
The aim of this study was to document application of locking plates for stabilization of acetabular fractures along with complications and clinical outcomes. We hypothesized that complications and clinical outcomes would be comparable to historical reports using non-locking plate and screw constructs.
Medical records of dogs presented with acetabular fractures at a single referral centre between 2010 and 2018 were reviewed. Cases surgically managed by open reduction and internal fixation, involving placement of at least one locking plate and screws, were included. Signalment, fracture classification, type of implant used, additional methods of stabilization, along with complications and neurological deficits, were collected. Long-term follow-up was based on Liverpool Osteoarthritis in Dogs questionnaire.
Eighteen acetabula were repaired in 17 dogs. Locking implants were VetLOX (4/18), string-of-pearls (7/18) and locking compression plates (7/18). Locking plates and screws were used as the sole method of fixation in 10/18 acetabula, and as adjunctive fixation with other implants in 8/18 acetabula. Two minor complications and one catastrophic complication were reported. Sixteen of seventeen dogs returned to function with radiographic documentation of fracture healing. Complication rate was comparable to historic reports using non-locking implants. Long-term outcomes assessed by Liverpool Osteoarthritis in Dogs questionnaire were positive in most cases.
Locking plates are a viable means of stabilizing acetabular fractures in dogs and can provide positive clinical outcomes. Surprisingly, problems including inaccurate fracture reduction and implant loosening were not fully avoided by use of locking implants but incidence was low.
本研究旨在记录锁定板在稳定髋臼骨折中的应用,以及并发症和临床结果。我们假设,并发症和临床结果将与使用非锁定板和螺钉结构的历史报告相当。
回顾了 2010 年至 2018 年期间,一家转诊中心收治的犬髋臼骨折患者的病历。纳入了通过切开复位内固定手术治疗的病例,包括至少使用一块锁定板和螺钉。收集了一般情况、骨折分类、使用的植入物类型、附加稳定方法以及并发症和神经功能缺损。长期随访基于利物浦犬骨关节炎问卷。
17 只犬的 18 个髋臼接受了修复。锁定植入物为 VetLOX(4/18)、珍珠串(7/18)和锁定加压板(7/18)。10/18 个髋臼仅使用锁定板和螺钉作为固定方法,8/18 个髋臼作为其他植入物的辅助固定方法。报告了 2 例轻微并发症和 1 例灾难性并发症。17 只犬中的 16 只返回功能,影像学显示骨折愈合。并发症发生率与使用非锁定植入物的历史报告相当。大多数病例的利物浦犬骨关节炎问卷长期结果为阳性。
锁定板是稳定犬髋臼骨折的一种可行方法,可以提供积极的临床结果。令人惊讶的是,包括骨折复位不准确和植入物松动在内的问题并没有完全通过使用锁定植入物来避免,但发生率较低。