Graduate School of Human-Environment Studies, Kyushu University, 744 Motooka, Nishi-ku, Fukuoka, Fukuoka, 819-0395, Japan.
Department of Kinesiology and Nutrition Sciences, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, USA.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2020 Jul;120(7):1519-1530. doi: 10.1007/s00421-020-04380-y. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
We investigated the influence of a change in stride frequency on physiological and perceptual responses during forward and backward running at different body weight support (BWS) levels.
Participants ran forward and backward at 0% BWS, 20% BWS, and 50% BWS conditions on a lower body positive pressure treadmill. The stride frequency conditions consisted of forward and backward running at preferred stride frequency (PSF), PSF + 10%, and PSF-10%. We measured oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text]O), carbon dioxide production, heart rate (HR), muscle activity from the lower extremity, and rating of perceived exertion (RPE). Furthermore, we calculated the metabolic cost of transport (CoT).
[Formula: see text]O HR, CoT, and muscle activity from the rectus femoris were significantly different between stride frequency conditions (P < 0.05). [Formula: see text]O, HR, and CoT during running at PSF + 10% were significantly higher than when running at PSF, regardless of running direction and BWS (P < 0.05). However, RPE was not different between stride frequency conditions (P > 0.05: e.g., 12.8-13.8 rankings in RPE for backward running at 0% BWS).
Manipulation of stride frequency during running may have a greater impact on physiological responses than on perceptual responses at a given speed, regardless of running direction and BWS. Individuals who need to increase their physiological demands during running may benefit from a 10% increase in stride frequency from the PSF, regardless of BWS and running direction.
我们研究了在不同的身体重量支撑(BWS)水平下,步频变化对前向和后向跑步时生理和感知反应的影响。
参与者在下肢正压跑步机上以 0%、20%和 50%BWS 条件下进行前向和后向跑步。步频条件包括以惯用步频(PSF)、PSF+10%和 PSF-10%进行前向和后向跑步。我们测量了摄氧量([Formula: see text]O)、二氧化碳产量、心率(HR)、下肢肌肉活动和感知用力程度(RPE)。此外,我们计算了运输代谢成本(CoT)。
步频条件之间的[Formula: see text]O、HR、CoT 和股直肌肌肉活动有显著差异(P<0.05)。在 PSF+10%的步频下跑步时的[Formula: see text]O、HR 和 CoT 明显高于 PSF 下的跑步,无论跑步方向和 BWS 如何(P<0.05)。然而,步频条件之间的 RPE 没有差异(P>0.05:例如,0%BWS 下后向跑步的 RPE 为 12.8-13.8 分)。
在给定速度下,与感知反应相比,步频的变化对生理反应的影响更大,而与跑步方向和 BWS 无关。需要在跑步时增加生理需求的个体可能会受益于从 PSF 增加 10%的步频,而与 BWS 和跑步方向无关。