Department of Energy Policy, Graduate School of Energy & Environment, Seoul National University of Science & Technology, 232 Gongneung-ro, Nowon-gu, Seoul, 01811, South Korea.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Jul;27(20):25582-25599. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-08949-0. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
Onshore wind farms have the advantage of a lower cost than offshore wind farms, but their negative environmental impact has been pointed out as a problem. If this environmental impact can be lessened, public acceptance of onshore wind farms will be significantly increased. This study investigates public attitudes to the lessening of the environmental impact of onshore wind farms, focusing on three specific attributes: visual impact, ecosystem destruction and noise pollution. The area of empirical analysis is South Korea, and the choice experiment data are analysed using a mixed logit model to reflect the heterogeneity of the respondents' preferences. The analysis results show that there is considerable heterogeneity in respondents' preferences and that they regard the visual impact and the ecosystem destruction as more important than the noise pollution. Respondents are willing to pay KRW 197, KRW 138 and KRW 69 for a 1% improvement in visual impact, a 1% reduction in ecosystem destruction and a 1-dB reduction in noise, respectively. The results of the scenario analysis show that simultaneous improvements in the three attributes should be made in order to ensure a certain level of public acceptance. Related policy implications are provided based on the analysis results.
陆上风电场的成本低于海上风电场,但已指出其对环境的负面影响是一个问题。如果这种环境影响可以减轻,公众对陆上风电场的接受程度将大大提高。本研究调查了公众对减轻陆上风电场环境影响的态度,重点关注三个具体属性:视觉冲击、生态系统破坏和噪声污染。实证分析的区域是韩国,并使用混合逻辑模型分析选择实验数据,以反映受访者偏好的异质性。分析结果表明,受访者的偏好存在相当大的异质性,他们认为视觉冲击和生态系统破坏比噪声污染更重要。受访者愿意为视觉冲击提高 1%、生态系统破坏减少 1%和噪声降低 1dB 分别支付 197 韩元、138 韩元、69 韩元。情景分析的结果表明,为了确保一定水平的公众接受度,应该同时改善这三个属性。根据分析结果提供了相关政策建议。