Gao Xin-Guo, Zhang Mei, Yue Xi-Ang, Zhang Hao, Xue Hua
Hand Anesthesiology Department, Changping District Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital, Beijing 102208, China.
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2020 Apr 25;33(4):363-7. doi: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2020.04.014.
To evaluate the effect of femoral and sciatic nerve block in total knee replacement of elderly patients under general anesthesia.
From July 2017 to July 2019, 60 patients with unilateral total knee replacement were selected, including 35 males and 25 females; aged 66 to 74(70.2±10.3) years;BMI 18 to 25 (21.3 ± 3.5) kg /m;course 2 to 3 (1.2±0.3) days. The patients were divided into general anesthesia group (G group) 30 cases and general anesthesia plus nerve block group(GNB group) 30 cases. In GNB group, the femoral nerve sciatic nerve block was guided by ultrasound before anesthesia induction, 20 to 25 ml was injected into the femoral nerve puncture point with 0.5% ropivacaine, 15 to 20 ml was injected into the sciaticnerve puncture point, and the total volume was no more than 40 ml. Postoperative intravenous analgesia (PCIA) was performed in two groups. The dosage of propofol and remifentanil was recorded. Forty-eight hours after operation, the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and postoperative farsightedness were recorded. When VAS>3, tramadol 2 mg / kg was injected intravenously, and the additional times of tramadol were recorded. Forty-eight hours after operation, patients' satisfaction score was used to record the length of stay.
Compared with group G, the dosage of propofol and remifentanil decreased, the incidence of PONV and the number of additional tramadol decreased, and the patients' satisfaction increased (<0.05). There was no significant difference in the length of stay between two groups (>0.05). The ROM and HSS scores of two groups after treatment were higher than those before treatment (<0.05), and the VAS scores were lower than those before treatment (<0.05). There was no significantdifference in ROM, VAS scores and HSS scores between two groups before treatment (>0.05). The ROM and HSS scores of the GNB group after treatment were higher than those of the G group (<0.05), and the VAS scores were lower than those of the G group (<0.05).
The application of femoral sciatic nerve block in total knee replacement under general anesthesia in elderly patients has good postoperative analgesic effect, and can reduce the dosage of general anesthesia, reduce PONV, and increase patient satisfaction.
评估股神经和坐骨神经阻滞在全身麻醉下老年患者全膝关节置换术中的效果。
选取2017年7月至2019年7月行单侧全膝关节置换术的患者60例,其中男性35例,女性25例;年龄66~74(70.2±10.3)岁;体重指数(BMI)18~25(21.3±3.5)kg/m²;病程2~3(1.2±0.3)天。将患者分为全身麻醉组(G组)30例和全身麻醉联合神经阻滞组(GNB组)30例。GNB组于麻醉诱导前在超声引导下行股神经和坐骨神经阻滞,在股神经穿刺点注入0.5%罗哌卡因20~25ml,在坐骨神经穿刺点注入15~20ml,总量不超过40ml。两组均行术后静脉自控镇痛(PCIA)。记录丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼用量。术后48h记录术后恶心呕吐(PONV)发生率、术后远视情况。当视觉模拟评分(VAS)>3分时,静脉注射曲马多2mg/kg,记录曲马多追加次数。术后48h采用患者满意度评分记录住院时间。
与G组比较,GNB组丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼用量减少,PONV发生率及曲马多追加次数减少,患者满意度提高(P<0.05)。两组住院时间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组治疗后膝关节活动度(ROM)和美国特种外科医院(HSS)评分均高于治疗前(P<0.05),VAS评分低于治疗前(P<0.05)。两组治疗前ROM、VAS评分及HSS评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。GNB组治疗后ROM、HSS评分高于G组(P<0.05),VAS评分低于G组(P<0.05)。
股神经和坐骨神经阻滞应用于老年患者全身麻醉下全膝关节置换术,术后镇痛效果良好,可减少全身麻醉用量,降低PONV发生率,提高患者满意度。