Karim Muhammad Osman, Khan Kashuf A, Khan Abdul Jalil, Javed Ayesha, Fazid Sheraz, Aslam Muhammad Imran
General Surgery, Royal Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital National Health Service (NHS) Trust, Shrewsbury, GBR.
Family Medicine, Khyber Medical University, Peshawar, PAK.
Cureus. 2020 Mar 30;12(3):e7479. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7479.
Introduction The triple assessment for a lump in the breast is standard practice and the robustness of assessment towards the diagnosis of breast cancer is crucial. The combination of the modalities, physical examination, imaging (mammogram and ultrasound), and fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is more accurate than any modality alone. Aim To examine the combined and individual predictive values of physical examination (P), mammography (M), ultrasound (U), FNAC (C), with core biopsy (B) - triple assessment in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Methods To obtain the results of physical examination (P), mammography (M), ultrasound (U), FNAC (C), and core biopsy (B), we examined the records of 124 breast cancer patients seen between April 1, 2009, and March 30, 2010. To assess the diagnostic potential of the combination of the modalities (P, U, and M), we considered all cases with a score of 4 (probably malignant) and 5 (malignant) as positive for malignancy. All cases with a score of 3 (equivocal), 2 (benign), and 1 (normal) were considered negative for malignancy. For FNAC, a score of 1 (insufficient sample), 2 (benign), and 3 (atypia/probably benign) were considered. All the patients were diagnosed with breast cancer on excision biopsy. Among 124 patients, 12 were excluded, as they were unfit for intervention. Results The accuracy of physical examination (P) as confirmed by core biopsy (B) is dependent on the experience of the surgeon. It has limitations in younger women and smaller lesions. In our study, P has a positive predictive value (PPV) of 58.9% when compared with surgical biopsy, which is comparable with other studies. Our results showed PPV 66.1% and after an ultrasound scan, the overall radiological grading (M & U) gives a PPV of 81.3%, reflecting the important role of ultrasound scans. Our results showed the sensitivity of FNAC to be 73.2%. Core biopsy was diagnostic in 107 (95.5%) patients, making it a reliable tool. Our results confirmed that a combination of the modalities (P, M, U, R, FNAC) is more accurate than any modality alone. Conclusion When all the three modalities are positive for a diagnosis of malignant breast disease, surgical biopsy confirms the breast cancer diagnosis with a PPV of 100% and a sensitivity of 95.5%.
引言 对乳腺肿块进行三联评估是标准做法,且评估对乳腺癌诊断的稳健性至关重要。体格检查、影像学检查(乳房X线摄影和超声检查)以及细针穿刺细胞学检查(FNAC)相结合比任何单一检查方式都更准确。
目的 研究体格检查(P)、乳房X线摄影(M)、超声检查(U)、FNAC(C)与粗针活检(B)——三联评估在乳腺癌诊断中的联合及个体预测价值。
方法 为获取体格检查(P)、乳房X线摄影(M)、超声检查(U)、FNAC(C)和粗针活检(B)的结果,我们查阅了2009年4月1日至2010年3月30日期间诊治的124例乳腺癌患者的记录。为评估这些检查方式联合(P、U和M)的诊断潜力,我们将所有评分为4分(可能为恶性)和5分(恶性)的病例视为恶性肿瘤阳性。所有评分为3分(可疑)、2分(良性)和1分(正常)的病例视为恶性肿瘤阴性。对于FNAC,评分为1分(样本不足)、2分(良性)和3分(异型性/可能为良性)。所有患者均经切除活检确诊为乳腺癌。124例患者中,12例因不适合干预而被排除。
结果 经粗针活检(B)证实的体格检查(P)的准确性取决于外科医生的经验。其在年轻女性和较小病变中存在局限性。在我们的研究中,与手术活检相比,P的阳性预测值(PPV)为58.9%,这与其他研究结果相当。我们的结果显示PPV为66.1%,超声扫描后,总体影像学分级(M和U)的PPV为81.3%,这反映了超声扫描的重要作用。我们的结果显示FNAC的敏感性为73.2%。粗针活检对107例(95.5%)患者具有诊断价值,使其成为一种可靠的工具。我们的结果证实,这些检查方式联合(P、M、U、R、FNAC)比任何单一检查方式都更准确。
结论 当所有三种检查方式对恶性乳腺疾病的诊断均为阳性时,手术活检确诊乳腺癌的PPV为100%,敏感性为95.5%。