JAMA. 1977 May 23;237(21):2303-10.
In a series of 450 patients with mild essential hypertension, propranolol alone (P), propranolol plus hydrochlorothiazide (P+T), propranolol plus hydralazine (P+H), and propranolol plus hydrochlorothiazide plus hydralazine (P+T+H) were compared to reserpine plus hydrochlorothiazide (R+T). Comparison was based on reduction of diastolic blood pressures (BP) to below 90 mm Hg and at least 5 mm Hg less than initial BP after six months of treatment. This was achieved in 92% of patients who received P+T+H, 88% taking R+T, 81% receiving P+T, 72% on P+H and 52% taking P alone. The number of drop-outs, morbid events, and terminating side effects were insignificantly different among the various regimens. In this study, P and P+H were less effective, while P+T and P+T+H were as effective as the standard regimen.
在450例轻度原发性高血压患者中,将单独使用普萘洛尔(P)、普萘洛尔加氢氯噻嗪(P+T)、普萘洛尔加肼屈嗪(P+H)以及普萘洛尔加氯噻嗪加肼屈嗪(P+T+H)与利血平加氢氯噻嗪(R+T)进行了比较。比较基于治疗六个月后舒张压(BP)降至90mmHg以下且比初始血压至少低5mmHg。接受P+T+H的患者中有92%达到这一目标,服用R+T的患者为88%,接受P+T的患者为81%,服用P+H的患者为72%,单独服用P的患者为52%。在各种治疗方案中,退出人数、发病事件和终止治疗的副作用无显著差异。在本研究中,P和P+H效果较差,而P+T和P+T+H与标准治疗方案效果相当。