Laparoscopic Surgery Is Safe and Beneficial in True Functional High-Risk Patients with Colorectal Cancer: Utilization of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test.

Patients with colorectal cancer deemed to be high-risk may be denied an elective laparoscopic resection due to subjective reasons. A comparison of the 30-day outcomes in true functional high-risk patients who underwent either open or laparoscopic colorectal resection was undertaken. A retrospective cohort of all functional high-risk patients as assessed by cardiopulmonary exercise test between July 2015 and April 2018 were identified. Anaerobic threshold of <11 mL/kg/minute was used as a physiologic indicator to determine a high-risk patient. Adherence to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) was ensured. values were computed via two-sided Fisher's exact test, and the exact Mann-Whitney U-test. Forest plots for relative risks with 95% confidence intervals were displayed on a log scale. One hundred forty-six patients were identified as high-risk. Outcomes demonstrated a trend to laparoscopic benefit in all Clavien-Dindo grades of postoperative complications, but especially in severe complications of grades 3-4 (3.5% versus 10.2%). Readmissions demonstrated a trend to laparoscopic surgery benefit (7% versus 11.8%), as did mortality (1.7% versus 3.4%). The rate of surgery-site complications was higher after open surgery (42.1% versus 22.4%,  = .0201). Wound infections were observed more frequently after open surgery (12.5% versus 1.72%,  = .0280). The estimated risk of all-grade complications was significantly higher after open anterior rectal resection (63.0% versus 29.6%,  = .0281) and there was significantly shorter stay after laparoscopic right colectomy (5 v. 7 days,  = .0490). Laparoscopic approach for colorectal resections in high-risk patients is safe and beneficial compared to open surgery, especially in patients undergoing laparoscopic resection of the rectum and right colon.