• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1 令吉的力量:马来西亚的低成本共付处方药模式。

Power of 1 Malaysian Ringgit: A Low-Cost Prescription Cost-Sharing Model in Malaysia.

机构信息

Kuala Lipis Hospital, Pahang, Malaysia.

Sultan Haji Ahmad Shah Hospital, Pahang, Malaysia.

出版信息

Value Health Reg Issues. 2020 May;21:245-251. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2019.12.002. Epub 2020 Apr 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.vhri.2019.12.002
PMID:32353759
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To calculate the total revenue under a hypothetical 1 Malaysian Ringgit (MYR) prescription cost sharing model in government healthcare facilities in Pahang, Malaysia.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted at outpatient pharmacy in all government healthcare facilities in Pahang from year 2013 to 2017. Each dispensed medication was calculated as 1 MYR and contributed to the total revenue.

RESULTS

A total of 11 hospitals and 81 health clinics were recruited into the study. A hospital could generate 0.311 million MYR per year, and a district health department could generate 0.623 million MYR per year, giving a total of 10.268 million MYR revenue every year in Pahang, Malaysia. Under the prescription medicines cost sharing scheme, it was shown that an average of 9.4% of the total pharmaceutical spending could be recovered. The recovery percentage was approximately fourfold higher in health clinics (16.5%-21.7%) when compared with that in hospitals (4.3%-5.2%).

CONCLUSION

An estimated 10 million MYR or 10% from the total Ministry of Health pharmaceutical spending could be collected under the proposed 1 MYR prescription cost sharing model.

摘要

目的

计算马来西亚彭亨州政府医疗机构实行 1 林吉特(MYR)处方费用共付假设模型下的总收入。

方法

在 2013 年至 2017 年期间,对彭亨州所有政府医疗机构的门诊药房进行了横断面研究。将每种配药都算作 1 林吉特,计入总收入。

结果

共招募了 11 家医院和 81 家卫生诊所参与研究。一家医院每年可产生 31.1 万林吉特的收入,一个地区卫生部门每年可产生 62.3 万林吉特的收入,马来西亚彭亨州每年的总收入为 1026.8 万林吉特。在处方药品费用分担计划下,显示可收回的药品总支出的平均比例为 9.4%。与医院(4.3%-5.2%)相比,卫生诊所的回收率(16.5%-21.7%)约高四倍。

结论

根据拟议的 1 林吉特处方费用分担模式,估计可从卫生部药品总支出中收取 1000 万林吉特或 10%的费用。

相似文献

1
Power of 1 Malaysian Ringgit: A Low-Cost Prescription Cost-Sharing Model in Malaysia.1 令吉的力量:马来西亚的低成本共付处方药模式。
Value Health Reg Issues. 2020 May;21:245-251. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2019.12.002. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
2
The fall and rise of cost sharing in Kenya: the impact of phased implementation.肯尼亚成本分担政策的起伏:分阶段实施的影响
Health Policy Plan. 1996 Mar;11(1):52-63. doi: 10.1093/heapol/11.1.52.
3
Physician and Patient Adjustment to Reference Pricing for Drugs.医生和患者对药品参考定价的调整。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Feb 5;3(2):e1920544. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.20544.
4
Social inequalities and pharmaceutical cost sharing in Italian regions.意大利地区的社会不平等与药品费用分担。
Int J Health Serv. 2014;44(4):761-85. doi: 10.2190/HS.44.4.e.
5
Paying for Drugs After the Medicare Part D Beneficiary Reaches the Catastrophic Limit: Lessons on Cost Sharing from Other US Policy Partnerships Between Government and Commercial Industry.医疗保险 D 部分受益人达到灾难性限额后支付药品费用:政府与商业行业之间其他美国政策伙伴关系在费用分担方面的经验教训。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2018 Dec;16(6):753-763. doi: 10.1007/s40258-018-0417-3.
6
Analysis of Proposed Medicare Part B to Part D Shift With Associated Changes in Total Spending and Patient Cost-Sharing for Prescription Drugs.分析拟议的医疗保险 B 部分到 D 部分的转变以及处方药总支出和患者自付费用的相关变化。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Mar 1;179(3):374-380. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.6417.
7
Revenues and Profits From Medicare Patients in Hospitals Participating in the 340B Drug Discount Program, 2013-2016.2013-2016 年参与 340B 药品折扣计划的医院的 Medicare 患者的收入和利润。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Oct 2;2(10):e1914141. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.14141.
8
Cost-Sharing Rates Increase During Deep Recession: Preliminary Data From Greece.费用分担率在深度衰退期间上升:来自希腊的初步数据。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016 May 28;5(12):687-692. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.62.
9
Specialty drug coupons lower out-of-pocket costs and may improve adherence at the risk of increasing premiums.特药优惠券降低了自付费用,并可能提高了患者的用药依从性,但却增加了保费。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Oct;33(10):1761-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0497.
10
Effects of changes in patient cost sharing and drug sample policies on prescription drug costs and utilization in a safety-net-provider setting.患者费用分担和药品样本政策变化对安全网医疗机构中处方药成本及使用情况的影响。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2004 Feb 1;61(3):267-72. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/61.3.267.