Lee Jung-Hoon, Choi Im-Rak, Choi Hyun-Su
Department of Physical Therapy, College of Nursing, Healthcare Sciences and Human Ecology, Dong-Eui University, Busan 47340, Korea.
Integrated Physical Medicine Institute, Dong-Eui University, Busan 47340, Korea.
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Apr 28;8(2):116. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8020116.
The aim of this study was to investigate the immediate static balance effects of bare foot, UD-Flex ankle-foot orthosis (AFO), and AFO using wire (AOW) of patients with stroke with foot drop. Seventeen patients with stroke with foot drop (8 men and 9 women) were randomized to three conditions (bare foot, UD-Flex AFO, or AOW made with a flexible material). Static balance was assessed using the Zebris (Zebris GmbH, Isny, Germany) and BioRescue (RM Ingenierie, Rodez, France) pressure platform by a single examiner, who did not design the AOW. The order of testing with the equipment was random. The center of pressure path length (mm) measured using Zebris showed significant differences among the three conditions (bare foot, 484.47 ± 208.42; UD-Flex AFO, 414.59 ± 144.43; AOW, 318.29 ± 157.60) ( < 0.05). The bare-foot condition was not significantly different from the UD-Flex AFO condition ( > 0.05), but was significantly different from the AOW condition ( < 0.05). The surface area ellipse (mm) measured using BioRescue showed significant differences among the three conditions (bare foot, 241.35 ± 153.76; UD-Flex AFO, 277.41 ± 381.83; AOW, 68.06 ± 48.98) ( < 0.05). The bare-foot condition was not significantly different from the UD-Flex AFO condition ( > 0.05), but the AOW condition was significantly different from the bare-foot ( < 0.05) and from the UD-Flex AFO conditions ( < 0.05). We suggest using the AOW made of flexible materials and wire instead of the UD-Flex AFO to improve immediate static balance of patients with stroke with foot drop after stroke. Further studies on the effects of dynamic balance and gait are required.
本研究旨在调查裸足、UD-Flex踝足矫形器(AFO)以及采用金属丝的AFO(AOW)对足下垂中风患者即时静态平衡的影响。17例足下垂中风患者(8例男性,9例女性)被随机分为三种情况(裸足、UD-Flex AFO或采用柔性材料制成的AOW)。由一名未参与AOW设计的检查者使用Zebris(德国伊施尼的Zebris GmbH公司)和BioRescue(法国罗德兹的RM Ingenierie公司)压力平台评估静态平衡。使用设备进行测试的顺序是随机的。使用Zebris测量的压力中心路径长度(mm)在三种情况之间显示出显著差异(裸足,484.47±208.42;UD-Flex AFO,414.59±144.43;AOW,318.29±157.60)(P<0.05)。裸足情况与UD-Flex AFO情况之间无显著差异(P>0.05),但与AOW情况有显著差异(P<0.05)。使用BioRescue测量的椭圆表面积(mm)在三种情况之间显示出显著差异(裸足,241.35±153.76;UD-Flex AFO,277.41±381.83;AOW,68.06±48.98)(P<0.05)。裸足情况与UD-Flex AFO情况之间无显著差异(P>0.05),但AOW情况与裸足(P<0.05)以及与UD-Flex AFO情况(P<0.05)均有显著差异。我们建议使用由柔性材料和金属丝制成的AOW而非UD-Flex AFO,以改善中风后足下垂中风患者的即时静态平衡。需要对动态平衡和步态的影响进行进一步研究。