Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Neurosurgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Sep 1;45(17):E1085-E1090. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003518.
Retrospective comparison between an interventional and a control cohort.
The aim of this study was to investigate whether the use of an augmented reality surgical navigation (ARSN) system for pedicle screw (PS) placement in deformity cases could alter the total implant density and PS to hook ratio compared to free-hand (FH) technique.
Surgical navigation in deformity surgery provides the possibility to place PS in small and deformed pedicles were hooks would otherwise have been placed, and thereby achieve a higher screw density in the constructs that may result in better long-term patient outcomes.
Fifteen deformity cases treated with ARSN were compared to 29 cases treated by FH. All surgeries were performed by the same orthopedic spine surgeon. PS, hook, and combined implant density were primary outcomes. Procedure time, deformity correction, length of hospital stay, and blood loss were secondary outcomes. The surgeries in the ARSN group were performed in a hybrid operating room (OR) with a ceiling-mounted robotic C-arm with integrated video cameras for AR navigation. The FH group was operated with or without fluoroscopy as deemed necessary by the surgeon.
Both groups had an overall high-density construct (>80% total implant density). The ARSN group, had a significantly higher PS density, 86.3% ± 14.6% versus 74.7% ± 13.9% in the FH group (P < 0.05), whereas the hook density was 2.2% ± 3.0% versus 9.7% ± 9.6% (P < 0.001). Neither the total procedure time (min) 431 ± 98 versus 417 ± 145 nor the deformity correction 59.3% ± 16.6% versus 60.1% ± 17.8% between the groups were significantly affected.
This study indicates that ARSN enables the surgeon to increase the PS density and thereby minimize the use of hooks in deformity surgery without prolonging the OR time. This may result in better constructs with possible long-term advantage and less need for revision surgery.
回顾性比较介入组和对照组。
本研究旨在探讨在畸形病例中使用增强现实手术导航(ARSN)系统放置椎弓根螺钉(PS)是否与徒手(FH)技术相比,改变总植入物密度和 PS 与钩的比例。
在畸形手术中,手术导航提供了在小而变形的椎弓根中放置 PS 的可能性,如果不使用 PS,否则需要使用钩,从而在构建物中实现更高的螺钉密度,这可能导致更好的长期患者结果。
将 15 例接受 ARSN 治疗的畸形病例与 29 例接受 FH 治疗的病例进行比较。所有手术均由同一位骨科脊柱外科医生进行。PS、钩和联合植入物密度是主要结果。手术时间、畸形矫正、住院时间和失血量是次要结果。ARSN 组的手术在具有集成视频摄像头的天花板安装机器人 C 臂的混合手术室(OR)中进行,用于 AR 导航。FH 组根据外科医生的需要,可在有或没有透视的情况下进行手术。
两组均具有总体高密度构建物(>80%的总植入物密度)。ARSN 组的 PS 密度明显更高,为 86.3%±14.6%,而 FH 组为 74.7%±13.9%(P<0.05),而钩密度为 2.2%±3.0%,而 FH 组为 9.7%±9.6%(P<0.001)。两组的总手术时间(分钟)431±98 与 417±145 或畸形矫正率 59.3%±16.6%与 60.1%±17.8%均无显著差异。
本研究表明,ARSN 使外科医生能够增加 PS 密度,从而最大限度地减少在畸形手术中使用钩,而不会延长 OR 时间。这可能会导致更好的构建物,可能具有长期优势,并且需要更少的翻修手术。
3 级。