Lymphoma Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
SC Ematologia, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata, Trieste, Italy.
Hematol Oncol. 2020 Aug;38(3):257-265. doi: 10.1002/hon.2742. Epub 2020 May 5.
We report final results of a phase II trial addressing efficacy and feasibility of lenalidomide maintenance in patients with chemosensitive relapse of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) not eligible for or failed after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Patients with relapsed DLBCL who achieved at least a partial response to salvage chemoimmunotherapy were enrolled and treated with lenalidomide 25 mg/day for 21 of 28 days for 2 years or until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was 1-year PFS. Forty-six of 48 enrolled patients were assessable. Most patients had IPI ≥2, advanced stage and extranodal disease before the salvage treatment that led to trial registration; 28 (61%) patients were older than 70 years. Lenalidomide was well tolerated. With the exception of neutropenia, grade-4 toxicities occurred in <1% of courses. Three patients died of complications during maintenance and three died due to second cancers at 32 to 64 months. There were 13 SAEs recorded in 12 patients; all these patients but two recovered. Lenalidomide was interrupted due to toxicity in other 6 patients, and 25 patients required dose reduction (transient in 21). At 1 year from registration, 31 patients were progression free. After a median follow-up of 65 (range 39-124) months, 22 patients remain progression free, with a 5-year PFS of 48% ± 7%. The duration of response to lenalidomide was longer than response to prior treatment in 30 (65%) patients. Benefit was observed both in de novo and transformed DLBCL, germinal-center-B-cell and nongerminal-center-B-cell subtypes. Twenty-six patients are alive (5-year OS 62% ± 7%). With the limitations of a nonrandomized design, these long-term results suggest that lenalidomide maintenance might bring benefit to patients with chemosensitive relapse of DLBCL not eligible for or failed after ASCT. Lenalidomide was associated with durable disease control and was well tolerated in this elderly population. Further investigations on immunomodulatory drugs as maintenance in these high-risk patients are warranted.
我们报告了一项针对 lenalidomide 维持治疗在不适合或自体干细胞移植(ASCT)后失败的化学敏感复发性弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者中的疗效和可行性的 II 期试验的最终结果。入组患者为接受挽救性化疗免疫治疗后至少部分缓解的复发性 DLBCL 患者,并接受 lenalidomide 25mg/天,28 天为 1 个周期,持续 2 年或直至疾病进展或出现不可接受的毒性。主要终点为 1 年无进展生存(PFS)。48 例入组患者中 46 例可评估。大多数患者在接受挽救性治疗前具有国际预后指数(IPI)≥2、晚期和结外疾病;28 例(61%)患者年龄大于 70 岁。lenalidomide 耐受性良好。除中性粒细胞减少症外,<1%的疗程发生 4 级毒性。3 例患者在维持治疗期间死于并发症,3 例患者在 32 至 64 个月时死于第二原发癌。12 例患者中有 13 例发生严重不良事件(SAE),所有这些患者除 2 例外均恢复。6 例患者因毒性而中断 lenalidomide 治疗,25 例患者需要减少剂量(21 例为一过性)。登记后 1 年,31 例患者无疾病进展。中位随访 65 个月(范围 39-124 个月)后,22 例患者仍无疾病进展,5 年 PFS 为 48%±7%。在 30 例(65%)患者中,lenalidomide 的缓解持续时间长于既往治疗。在初治和转化型 DLBCL、生发中心 B 细胞和非生发中心 B 细胞亚型中均观察到获益。26 例患者存活(5 年 OS 为 62%±7%)。鉴于非随机设计的局限性,这些长期结果表明,lenalidomide 维持治疗可能使不适合或 ASCT 后失败的化学敏感复发性 DLBCL 患者获益。lenalidomide 与持久的疾病控制相关,在该老年人群中具有良好的耐受性。在这些高危患者中,有必要进一步开展免疫调节药物作为维持治疗的研究。