Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Campus Virchow-Klinikum and Campus Charité Mitte, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
Department of Surgery, Campus Virchow-Klinikum and Campus Charité Mitte, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Nutrients. 2020 Apr 26;12(5):1217. doi: 10.3390/nu12051217.
Liver abnormalities in intestinal failure (IF) patients receiving parenteral nutrition (PN) can progress undetected by standard laboratory tests to intestinal failure associated liver disease (IFALD). The aim of this longitudinal study is to evaluate the ability of non-invasive liver function tests to assess liver function following the initiation of PN. Twenty adult patients with IF were prospectively included at PN initiation and received scheduled follow-up assessments after 6, 12, and 24 months between 2014 and 2019. Each visit included liver assessment (LiMAx [Liver Maximum Capacity] test, ICG [indocyanine green] test, FibroScan), laboratory tests (standard laboratory test, NAFLD [non-alcoholic fatty liver disease] score, FIB-4 [fibrosis-4] score), nutritional status (bioelectrical impedance analysis, indirect calorimetry), and quality of life assessment. The patients were categorized post-hoc based on their continuous need for PN into a reduced parenteral nutrition (RPN) group and a stable parenteral nutrition (SPN) group. While the SPN group ( = 9) had significantly shorter small bowel length and poorer nutritional status at baseline compared to the RPN group ( = 11), no difference in liver function was observed between the distinct groups. Over time, liver function determined by LiMAx did continuously decrease from baseline to 24 months in the SPN group but remained stable in the RPN group. This decrease in liver function assessed with LiMAx in the SPN group preceded deterioration of all other investigated liver function tests during the study period. Our results suggest that the liver function over time is primarily determined by the degree of intestinal failure. Furthermore, the LiMAx test appeared more sensitive in detecting early changes in liver function in comparison to other liver function tests.
肠衰竭(IF)患者在接受肠外营养(PN)时可能会出现肝脏异常,而这些异常通过标准实验室检测可能无法被发现,从而进展为肠衰竭相关肝病(IFALD)。本纵向研究旨在评估非侵入性肝功能检测在开始 PN 后评估肝功能的能力。2014 年至 2019 年期间,前瞻性纳入 20 例 IF 成人患者,在开始 PN 时进行研究,并在 6、12 和 24 个月时进行计划的随访评估。每次就诊均包括肝脏评估(LiMAx [肝脏最大容量] 检测、ICG [吲哚菁绿] 检测、FibroScan)、实验室检测(标准实验室检测、NAFLD [非酒精性脂肪性肝病] 评分、FIB-4 [纤维化-4] 评分)、营养状况(生物电阻抗分析、间接测热法)和生活质量评估。根据患者持续 PN 的需要,将患者分为减少肠外营养(RPN)组和稳定肠外营养(SPN)组。虽然 SPN 组(n=9)的小肠长度和营养状况明显比 RPN 组(n=11)差,但两组间的肝功能无差异。随着时间的推移,LiMAx 检测到的肝功能在 SPN 组从基线持续下降到 24 个月,但在 RPN 组保持稳定。在 SPN 组,LiMAx 评估的肝功能下降发生在研究期间所有其他肝功能检测恶化之前。我们的结果表明,随时间推移,肝功能主要由肠衰竭的严重程度决定。此外,与其他肝功能检测相比,LiMAx 检测在检测肝功能早期变化方面似乎更敏感。