Huntsman Cancer Institute and University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Department of Medicine and Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Cancer Epidemiol. 2020 Jun;66:101724. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2020.101724. Epub 2020 May 8.
Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing for early detection of prostate cancer is low-value when it is not indicated by guidelines and the harms outweigh the benefits. In this retrospective cohort study, we identify provider and patient factors associated with PSA testing, particularly in situations where testing would be low-value.
We used electronic health record data from 2011 to 2018 representing 1,738,021 health system encounters in the United States. Using logistic generalized estimating equation models, we examined patient factors (age, comorbid illness, family history, race and prior PSA results), provider factors (gender, specialty, graduation year and medical school rank), and overall time trends associated with PSA testing in low-value and appropriate settings.
Comorbid illness (odds ratio (OR) 0.0 for 3+ conditions vs none) and no prior PSA testing (OR 0.2) were associated with a lower likelihood of PSA testing in low-value situations, while family history of prostate cancer (OR 1.6) and high prior PSA test results (OR 2.2 for PSA > 6 vs 0-1) were associated with a greater likelihood. Men aged 55-65 years were at greatest risk for PSA testing in low-value situations. The provider factor associated with PSA testing in low-value situations was specialty, with urologists being most likely (OR 2.3 versus advanced practice providers). Internal medicine physicians were more likely to perform PSA testing during low-value situations (OR 1.3 versus advanced practice providers) but much more likely to order a PSA test where appropriate (OR 2.2). All PSA testing decreased since 2011.
We identified several patient and provider factors associated with PSA testing in low-value settings. Some aspects suggest attention to relevant factors for PSA testing in low-value settings (e.g. comorbid illness), while others may encourage PSA testing in low-value settings (e.g. family history). The greatest likelihood of PSA testing in low-value settings is among men within the age range most commonly recommended by guidelines.
在不符合指南标准且弊大于利的情况下,前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测用于早期发现前列腺癌的价值较低。在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们确定了与 PSA 检测相关的提供者和患者因素,特别是在检测价值较低的情况下。
我们使用了 2011 年至 2018 年代表美国 1738021 例医疗系统就诊的电子健康记录数据。使用逻辑广义估计方程模型,我们检查了患者因素(年龄、合并症、家族史、种族和先前的 PSA 结果)、提供者因素(性别、专业、毕业年份和医学院排名)以及与低值和适当环境下 PSA 检测相关的总体时间趋势。
合并症(存在 3 种或以上疾病的可能性比无合并症的可能性低 0.0 分)和无先前 PSA 检测(可能性低 0.2)与低值情况下 PSA 检测的可能性降低相关,而前列腺癌家族史(可能性高 1.6)和高先前 PSA 检测结果(PSA > 6 与 0-1 的可能性比高 2.2)与可能性增加相关。55-65 岁的男性在低值情况下进行 PSA 检测的风险最大。与低值情况下 PSA 检测相关的提供者因素是专业,泌尿科医生最有可能(可能性比高级实践提供者高 2.3)。内科医生在低值情况下更有可能进行 PSA 检测(可能性比高级实践提供者高 1.3),但更有可能在适当的情况下开具 PSA 检测(可能性高 2.2)。自 2011 年以来,所有 PSA 检测均有所下降。
我们确定了一些与低值情况下 PSA 检测相关的患者和提供者因素。某些方面表明需要注意低值情况下 PSA 检测的相关因素(例如合并症),而其他方面可能会鼓励低值情况下 PSA 检测(例如家族史)。低值情况下 PSA 检测的可能性最大的是指南最常推荐的年龄范围内的男性。