Suppr超能文献

与适当和低价值 PSA 检测相关的因素。

Factors associated with appropriate and low-value PSA testing.

机构信息

Huntsman Cancer Institute and University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Department of Medicine and Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.

出版信息

Cancer Epidemiol. 2020 Jun;66:101724. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2020.101724. Epub 2020 May 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing for early detection of prostate cancer is low-value when it is not indicated by guidelines and the harms outweigh the benefits. In this retrospective cohort study, we identify provider and patient factors associated with PSA testing, particularly in situations where testing would be low-value.

METHODS

We used electronic health record data from 2011 to 2018 representing 1,738,021 health system encounters in the United States. Using logistic generalized estimating equation models, we examined patient factors (age, comorbid illness, family history, race and prior PSA results), provider factors (gender, specialty, graduation year and medical school rank), and overall time trends associated with PSA testing in low-value and appropriate settings.

RESULTS

Comorbid illness (odds ratio (OR) 0.0 for 3+ conditions vs none) and no prior PSA testing (OR 0.2) were associated with a lower likelihood of PSA testing in low-value situations, while family history of prostate cancer (OR 1.6) and high prior PSA test results (OR 2.2 for PSA > 6 vs 0-1) were associated with a greater likelihood. Men aged 55-65 years were at greatest risk for PSA testing in low-value situations. The provider factor associated with PSA testing in low-value situations was specialty, with urologists being most likely (OR 2.3 versus advanced practice providers). Internal medicine physicians were more likely to perform PSA testing during low-value situations (OR 1.3 versus advanced practice providers) but much more likely to order a PSA test where appropriate (OR 2.2). All PSA testing decreased since 2011.

CONCLUSION

We identified several patient and provider factors associated with PSA testing in low-value settings. Some aspects suggest attention to relevant factors for PSA testing in low-value settings (e.g. comorbid illness), while others may encourage PSA testing in low-value settings (e.g. family history). The greatest likelihood of PSA testing in low-value settings is among men within the age range most commonly recommended by guidelines.

摘要

背景

在不符合指南标准且弊大于利的情况下,前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测用于早期发现前列腺癌的价值较低。在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们确定了与 PSA 检测相关的提供者和患者因素,特别是在检测价值较低的情况下。

方法

我们使用了 2011 年至 2018 年代表美国 1738021 例医疗系统就诊的电子健康记录数据。使用逻辑广义估计方程模型,我们检查了患者因素(年龄、合并症、家族史、种族和先前的 PSA 结果)、提供者因素(性别、专业、毕业年份和医学院排名)以及与低值和适当环境下 PSA 检测相关的总体时间趋势。

结果

合并症(存在 3 种或以上疾病的可能性比无合并症的可能性低 0.0 分)和无先前 PSA 检测(可能性低 0.2)与低值情况下 PSA 检测的可能性降低相关,而前列腺癌家族史(可能性高 1.6)和高先前 PSA 检测结果(PSA > 6 与 0-1 的可能性比高 2.2)与可能性增加相关。55-65 岁的男性在低值情况下进行 PSA 检测的风险最大。与低值情况下 PSA 检测相关的提供者因素是专业,泌尿科医生最有可能(可能性比高级实践提供者高 2.3)。内科医生在低值情况下更有可能进行 PSA 检测(可能性比高级实践提供者高 1.3),但更有可能在适当的情况下开具 PSA 检测(可能性高 2.2)。自 2011 年以来,所有 PSA 检测均有所下降。

结论

我们确定了一些与低值情况下 PSA 检测相关的患者和提供者因素。某些方面表明需要注意低值情况下 PSA 检测的相关因素(例如合并症),而其他方面可能会鼓励低值情况下 PSA 检测(例如家族史)。低值情况下 PSA 检测的可能性最大的是指南最常推荐的年龄范围内的男性。

相似文献

1
Factors associated with appropriate and low-value PSA testing.
Cancer Epidemiol. 2020 Jun;66:101724. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2020.101724. Epub 2020 May 8.
2
Prostate cancer screening practices in a large, integrated health system: 2007-2014.
BJU Int. 2017 Aug;120(2):257-264. doi: 10.1111/bju.13793. Epub 2017 Feb 26.
4
Defining low-value PSA testing in a large retrospective cohort: Finding common ground between discordant guidelines.
Cancer Epidemiol. 2018 Oct;56:112-117. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2018.08.003. Epub 2018 Aug 18.
5
Decision fatigue in low-value prostate cancer screening.
Cancer. 2021 Sep 15;127(18):3343-3353. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33644. Epub 2021 May 27.
7
Prostate-specific antigen testing among the elderly in community-based family medicine practices.
J Am Board Fam Med. 2009 May-Jun;22(3):257-65. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2009.03.080136.
8
Screening for Prostate Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.
JAMA. 2018 May 8;319(18):1901-1913. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.3710.
10
Pre-screening Discussions and Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing for Prostate Cancer Screening.
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Aug;49(2):259-63. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.02.007. Epub 2015 May 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Health Service Area on Primary Care Physician Provision of Low-Value Cancer Screening.
Ann Intern Med. 2024 May;177(5):583-591. doi: 10.7326/M23-1456. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
2
Decision fatigue in low-value prostate cancer screening.
Cancer. 2021 Sep 15;127(18):3343-3353. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33644. Epub 2021 May 27.

本文引用的文献

2
Exnovation of Low Value Care: A Decade of Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening Practices.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Jan;67(1):29-36. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15591. Epub 2018 Oct 6.
3
Defining low-value PSA testing in a large retrospective cohort: Finding common ground between discordant guidelines.
Cancer Epidemiol. 2018 Oct;56:112-117. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2018.08.003. Epub 2018 Aug 18.
4
Screening for Prostate Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.
JAMA. 2018 May 8;319(18):1901-1913. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.3710.
5
NCCN Guidelines Updates: Prostate Cancer and Prostate Cancer Early Detection.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018 May;16(5S):620-623. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.0036.
6
Calculating life expectancy to inform prostate cancer screening and treatment decisions.
BJU Int. 2017 Jul;120(1):9-11. doi: 10.1111/bju.13812. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
7
Prostate cancer screening practices in a large, integrated health system: 2007-2014.
BJU Int. 2017 Aug;120(2):257-264. doi: 10.1111/bju.13793. Epub 2017 Feb 26.
8
Risk of hospitalization and death following prostate biopsy in Scotland.
Public Health. 2017 Jan;142:102-110. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2016.10.006. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
9
Complications After Systematic, Random, and Image-guided Prostate Biopsy.
Eur Urol. 2017 Mar;71(3):353-365. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.004. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
10
NCCN Guidelines Insights: Prostate Cancer Early Detection, Version 2.2016.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2016 May;14(5):509-19. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2016.0060.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验