Reproductive Medicine Center, Tianjin United Family Hospital, Tianjin, China.
School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia.
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020 Jun;37(6):1295-1302. doi: 10.1007/s10815-020-01789-4. Epub 2020 May 2.
To investigate the between-laboratory reproducibility of embryo selection/deselection effectiveness using qualitative and quantitative time-lapse parameters.
A systematic search was performed on MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library (up to February 2020) without restriction on date, language, document type, and publication status. Measuring outcomes included implantation, blastulation, good-quality blastocyst formation, and euploid blastocyst.
We detected 6 retrospective cohort studies externally validating the first clinical time-lapse model (Meseguer) emphasizing quantitative parameters, of which 3 (including one involving 2 independent centers) were included for the pooled analysis. Receiver operating characteristics analysis showed reduced predictive power of the model when either including or not including sister clinic validation. Fifteen cohort studies evaluating qualitative parameters were included for meta-analysis, and the mean Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was 5.3. Overall, meta-analysis showed significantly adverse association between the presence of ≥ 1 cleavage abnormalities and embryo implantation rates (11 studies, n = 7266; RR = 0.39[0.28, 0.55]; I = 57%). Further analysis showed adverse impacts of direct cleavage (7 studies, n = 7065; RR = 0.28 [0.15, 0.54] ; I = 46%), reverse cleavage (2 studies, n = 3622; RR = 0.16 [0.03, 0.75] ; I = 0%), chaotic cleavage (2 studies, n = 3643; RR = 0.11 [0.02, 0.69] ; I = 24%), and multinucleation (5 studies, n = 2576; RR = 0.59 [0.50, 0.69] ; I = 0%), but not the < 6 intercellular contact points at the 4-cell stage (1 study, n = 185; RR = 0.17 [0.02, 1.15] ).
Qualitative time-lapse parameters are reliably associated with embryo developmental potential among laboratories, whereas the reproducibility of time-lapse embryo selection model that emphasizes quantitative parameters may be compromised when externally applied.
利用定性和定量的时间延迟参数来研究胚胎选择/淘汰效果的实验室间再现性。
系统检索 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 图书馆(截至 2020 年 2 月),不限制日期、语言、文件类型和出版状态。测量结果包括着床、囊胚形成、优质囊胚形成和整倍体囊胚。
我们检测到 6 项回顾性队列研究,这些研究对外验证了第一个临床时间延迟模型(Meseguer),强调定量参数,其中 3 项(包括 1 项涉及 2 个独立中心)被纳入汇总分析。受试者工作特征分析表明,当包括或不包括姐妹诊所验证时,该模型的预测能力降低。纳入 15 项定性参数评估的队列研究进行荟萃分析,纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表平均为 5.3。总体而言,荟萃分析显示,存在≥1 个卵裂异常与胚胎着床率之间存在显著的负相关(11 项研究,n=7266;RR=0.39[0.28, 0.55];I=57%)。进一步分析显示,直接卵裂(7 项研究,n=7065;RR=0.28[0.15, 0.54];I=46%)、反向卵裂(2 项研究,n=3622;RR=0.16[0.03, 0.75];I=0%)、混沌卵裂(2 项研究,n=3643;RR=0.11[0.02, 0.69];I=24%)和多核(5 项研究,n=2576;RR=0.59[0.50, 0.69];I=0%)有不良影响,但 4 细胞期的<6 个细胞间接触点(1 项研究,n=185;RR=0.17[0.02, 1.15])没有不良影响。
定性时间延迟参数与实验室胚胎发育潜力可靠相关,而强调定量参数的时间延迟胚胎选择模型的重现性在外部应用时可能受到影响。