Suppr超能文献

使用定性和定量参数的时差胚胎选择的实验室间可重复性:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Between-laboratory reproducibility of time-lapse embryo selection using qualitative and quantitative parameters: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Reproductive Medicine Center, Tianjin United Family Hospital, Tianjin, China.

School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia.

出版信息

J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020 Jun;37(6):1295-1302. doi: 10.1007/s10815-020-01789-4. Epub 2020 May 2.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate the between-laboratory reproducibility of embryo selection/deselection effectiveness using qualitative and quantitative time-lapse parameters.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed on MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library (up to February 2020) without restriction on date, language, document type, and publication status. Measuring outcomes included implantation, blastulation, good-quality blastocyst formation, and euploid blastocyst.

RESULTS

We detected 6 retrospective cohort studies externally validating the first clinical time-lapse model (Meseguer) emphasizing quantitative parameters, of which 3 (including one involving 2 independent centers) were included for the pooled analysis. Receiver operating characteristics analysis showed reduced predictive power of the model when either including or not including sister clinic validation. Fifteen cohort studies evaluating qualitative parameters were included for meta-analysis, and the mean Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was 5.3. Overall, meta-analysis showed significantly adverse association between the presence of ≥ 1 cleavage abnormalities and embryo implantation rates (11 studies, n = 7266; RR = 0.39[0.28, 0.55]; I = 57%). Further analysis showed adverse impacts of direct cleavage (7 studies, n = 7065; RR = 0.28 [0.15, 0.54] ; I = 46%), reverse cleavage (2 studies, n = 3622; RR = 0.16 [0.03, 0.75] ; I = 0%), chaotic cleavage (2 studies, n = 3643; RR = 0.11 [0.02, 0.69] ; I = 24%), and multinucleation (5 studies, n = 2576; RR = 0.59 [0.50, 0.69] ; I = 0%), but not the < 6 intercellular contact points at the 4-cell stage (1 study, n = 185; RR = 0.17 [0.02, 1.15] ).

CONCLUSIONS

Qualitative time-lapse parameters are reliably associated with embryo developmental potential among laboratories, whereas the reproducibility of time-lapse embryo selection model that emphasizes quantitative parameters may be compromised when externally applied.

摘要

目的

利用定性和定量的时间延迟参数来研究胚胎选择/淘汰效果的实验室间再现性。

方法

系统检索 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 图书馆(截至 2020 年 2 月),不限制日期、语言、文件类型和出版状态。测量结果包括着床、囊胚形成、优质囊胚形成和整倍体囊胚。

结果

我们检测到 6 项回顾性队列研究,这些研究对外验证了第一个临床时间延迟模型(Meseguer),强调定量参数,其中 3 项(包括 1 项涉及 2 个独立中心)被纳入汇总分析。受试者工作特征分析表明,当包括或不包括姐妹诊所验证时,该模型的预测能力降低。纳入 15 项定性参数评估的队列研究进行荟萃分析,纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表平均为 5.3。总体而言,荟萃分析显示,存在≥1 个卵裂异常与胚胎着床率之间存在显著的负相关(11 项研究,n=7266;RR=0.39[0.28, 0.55];I=57%)。进一步分析显示,直接卵裂(7 项研究,n=7065;RR=0.28[0.15, 0.54];I=46%)、反向卵裂(2 项研究,n=3622;RR=0.16[0.03, 0.75];I=0%)、混沌卵裂(2 项研究,n=3643;RR=0.11[0.02, 0.69];I=24%)和多核(5 项研究,n=2576;RR=0.59[0.50, 0.69];I=0%)有不良影响,但 4 细胞期的<6 个细胞间接触点(1 项研究,n=185;RR=0.17[0.02, 1.15])没有不良影响。

结论

定性时间延迟参数与实验室胚胎发育潜力可靠相关,而强调定量参数的时间延迟胚胎选择模型的重现性在外部应用时可能受到影响。

相似文献

4
Clinical outcomes following selection of human preimplantation embryos with time-lapse monitoring: a systematic review.
Hum Reprod Update. 2014 Sep-Oct;20(5):617-31. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmu023. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
7
Morphokinetic analysis of human embryo development and its relationship to the female age: a retrospective time-lapse imaging study.
Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand). 2017 Aug 30;63(8):84-92. doi: 10.14715/cmb/2017.63.8.18.
9
Morphokinetic analysis and embryonic prediction for blastocyst formation through an integrated time-lapse system.
Fertil Steril. 2016 Feb;105(2):376-84.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.11.001. Epub 2015 Nov 17.

引用本文的文献

2
Non-invasive prediction of human embryonic ploidy using artificial intelligence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Oct 24;77:102897. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102897. eCollection 2024 Nov.
4
Early rescue oocyte activation at 5 h post-ICSI is a useful strategy for avoiding unexpected fertilization failure and low fertilization in ICSI cycles.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Jan 4;14:1301505. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1301505. eCollection 2023.
5
A brief history of artificial intelligence embryo selection: from black-box to glass-box.
Hum Reprod. 2024 Feb 1;39(2):285-292. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead254.
6
Cleavage Patterns of 9600 Embryos: The Importance of Irregular Cleavage.
J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 30;12(17):5656. doi: 10.3390/jcm12175656.
7
8
9
Non-invasive evaluation of embryo quality for the selection of transferable embryos in human in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer.
Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2022 Dec;49(4):225-238. doi: 10.5653/cerm.2022.05575. Epub 2022 Nov 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Time-lapse systems for embryo incubation and assessment in assisted reproduction.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 25;5(5):CD011320. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011320.pub3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验