Suppr超能文献

比较标准几何视像喉镜和超角度视像喉镜在急诊科首次尝试插管的成功率。

Comparing Emergency Department First-Attempt Intubation Success With Standard-Geometry and Hyperangulated Video Laryngoscopes.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 2020 Sep;76(3):332-338. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.03.011. Epub 2020 Apr 30.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

It is unclear whether laryngoscopy using a standard-geometry blade shape, able to obtain both direct and indirect views, is associated with different first-attempt success or adverse events during emergency intubation compared with using a hyperangulated blade capable of indirect laryngoscopy only. We sought to compare first-attempt intubation success between patients intubated with a standard geometry video laryngoscope versus a hyperangulated video laryngoscope.

METHODS

We analyzed data from the National Emergency Airway Registry from January 2016 to December 2018. Patients aged 14 years or older were included if the first attempt at oral intubation was performed with a standard-geometry or hyperangulated video laryngoscope. We used multiple logistic regression to determine whether blade shape was independently associated with first-attempt intubation success.

RESULTS

During the study period, 11,927 of 19,071 intubation encounters met inclusion criteria, including 7,255 (61%) with a standard blade and 4,672 (39%) with a hyperangulated blade. Unadjusted analysis revealed higher success with a standard-geometry blade, 91.9% versus 89.2% (absolute difference 2.7% [95% confidence interval 1.6% to 3.8%]; odds ratio for standard-geometry laryngoscope compared with hyperangulated laryngoscope 1.37 [95% confidence interval 1.21 to 1.55]). The logistic regression model, however, demonstrated no association between blade shape and first-attempt success (adjusted odds ratio for standard-geometry laryngoscopy compared with hyperangulated laryngoscopy 1.32 [95% confidence interval 0.81 to 2.17]).

CONCLUSION

In this large registry of patients intubated with video laryngoscopy in the emergency department, we observed no association between blade shape (standard-geometry versus hyperangulated laryngoscope) and first-attempt intubation success after adjusting for confounding variables.

摘要

研究目的

目前尚不清楚在急诊插管中,使用能够获得直接和间接视野的标准几何刀片形状的喉镜与仅能进行间接喉镜检查的高角度刀片相比,首次尝试插管成功率或不良事件是否存在差异。我们旨在比较使用标准几何视频喉镜和高角度视频喉镜插管的患者首次尝试插管成功率。

方法

我们分析了 2016 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月期间国家紧急气道登记处的数据。如果使用标准几何或高角度视频喉镜进行了首次口腔插管尝试,则将年龄在 14 岁及以上的患者纳入研究。我们使用多因素逻辑回归来确定刀片形状是否与首次尝试插管成功率独立相关。

结果

在研究期间,19071 次插管尝试中有 11927 次符合纳入标准,其中 7255 次(61%)使用标准刀片,4672 次(39%)使用高角度刀片。未调整分析显示,标准几何刀片的成功率更高,为 91.9%,而高角度刀片为 89.2%(绝对差异 2.7%[95%置信区间 1.6%至 3.8%];标准喉镜与高角度喉镜相比的优势比为 1.37[95%置信区间 1.21 至 1.55])。然而,逻辑回归模型显示刀片形状与首次尝试成功率之间无关联(标准喉镜与高角度喉镜相比的调整优势比为 1.32[95%置信区间 0.81 至 2.17])。

结论

在这项使用视频喉镜对急诊科插管患者进行的大型登记研究中,我们观察到在调整混杂变量后,刀片形状(标准几何与高角度喉镜)与首次尝试插管成功率之间无关联。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验