Suppr超能文献

先前检查呈阳性后进行导管血管造影术诊断胃肠道出血的时间并不影响出血的识别。

Time to Catheter Angiography for Gastrointestinal Bleeding after Prior Positive Investigation Does Not Affect Bleed Identification.

作者信息

Brahmbhatt Akshaar, Rao Pranay, Cantos Andrew, Butani Devang

机构信息

Departments of Radiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, United States.

Departments of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, United States.

出版信息

J Clin Imaging Sci. 2020 Apr 6;10:16. doi: 10.25259/JCIS_132_2019. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine, time to angiography for patients with positive gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) on prior investigation (endoscopy [ES], nuclear medicine [NM] Tc99m red blood cells (RBC) scan, or computed tomography angiography), affects angiographic bleed identification.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Visceral Angiograms performed from January 2012 to August 2017 were evaluated. Initial angiograms performed for GIB were included in the study. Exclusion criteria included recent abdominal surgery or procedure (30 days), empiric embolization (embolization without visualized active bleeding), and use of vasodilators, or subsequent angiogram. Timing and results of ES, NM Tc99m RBC scan, or computed tomography angiogram and catheter angiogram were recorded. In addition, age, gender, angiogram time, anti- platelet therapy, anti-coagulation therapy, bleed location, international normalized ratio, and units of packed RBCs received in the 24 h before catheter angiography were included in the study.

RESULTS

One hundred and seventy angiograms were included in the final analysis. Forty-three angiograms resulted in the identification of an active bleed (68.9 years, and 67.4% male). All of these patients were embolized successfully. One hundred and twenty-seven angiograms failed to identify an active bleed (70.4 years, and 49.6% male). No significance was found across the two groups with respect to time from prior positive investigation. Receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated that units of packed RBCs received in the preceding 24 h were correlated with positive bleed identification on catheter angiography.

CONCLUSION

Time to angiography from prior positive investigation, including ES, NM Tc99m RBC scan, or computed tomography angiogram does not correlate with positive angiographic outcomes. Increasing units of packed RBCs administered in the 24 h before angiogram do correlate with positive angiographic findings.

摘要

目的

确定先前检查(内镜检查[ES]、核医学[NM]锝99m红细胞(RBC)扫描或计算机断层血管造影)显示胃肠道出血(GIB)阳性的患者进行血管造影的时间是否会影响血管造影对出血的识别。

材料与方法

对2012年1月至2017年8月期间进行的内脏血管造影进行评估。因GIB进行的首次血管造影纳入研究。排除标准包括近期腹部手术或操作(30天内)、经验性栓塞(未发现活动性出血的栓塞)、使用血管扩张剂或后续血管造影。记录ES、NM锝99m RBC扫描或计算机断层血管造影以及导管血管造影的时间和结果。此外,研究还纳入了年龄、性别、血管造影时间、抗血小板治疗、抗凝治疗、出血部位、国际标准化比值以及导管血管造影前24小时接受的浓缩红细胞单位数。

结果

最终分析纳入了170例血管造影。43例血管造影发现了活动性出血(平均年龄68.9岁,男性占67.4%)。所有这些患者均成功进行了栓塞。127例血管造影未发现活动性出血(平均年龄70.4岁,男性占49.6%)。两组在先前阳性检查后的时间方面未发现显著差异。受试者操作特征分析表明,前24小时接受的浓缩红细胞单位数与导管血管造影时出血阳性识别相关。

结论

从先前阳性检查(包括ES、NM锝99m RBC扫描或计算机断层血管造影)到进行血管造影的时间与血管造影阳性结果无关。血管造影前24小时输注的浓缩红细胞单位数增加与血管造影阳性发现相关。

相似文献

3
Time to conventional angiography in gastrointestinal bleeding: CT angiography compared to tagged RBC scan.
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020 Feb;45(2):307-311. doi: 10.1007/s00261-019-02151-8.
6
Factors influencing the yield of mesenteric angiography in lower gastrointestinal bleed.
World J Radiol. 2014 May 28;6(5):218-22. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v6.i5.218.
9
ACR Appropriateness Criteria Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
J Am Coll Radiol. 2017 May;14(5S):S177-S188. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.02.038.

引用本文的文献

1
Endoscopic hemostasis makes the difference: Angiographic treatment in patients with lower gastrointestinal bleeding.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Jul 16;13(7):221-232. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v13.i7.221.

本文引用的文献

2
Role of Angiography in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Historical Perspective.
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018 Jun;29(6):905-907. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2018.01.790.
3
Endoscopic and angiographic management of lower gastrointestinal bleeding: Review of the published literature.
United European Gastroenterol J. 2018 Apr;6(3):337-342. doi: 10.1177/2050640617746299. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
5
Localizing Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage: CT Angiography Versus Tagged RBC Scintigraphy.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Sep;207(3):578-84. doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.15714. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
8
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Scintigraphy in the Early 21st Century.
J Nucl Med. 2016 Feb;57(2):252-9. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.157289. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
10
Outcomes of Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices Undergoing Mesenteric Angiography for Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2015 Nov;26(11):1710-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2015.07.026. Epub 2015 Sep 2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验