Brahmbhatt Akshaar, Rao Pranay, Cantos Andrew, Butani Devang
Departments of Radiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, United States.
Departments of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, United States.
J Clin Imaging Sci. 2020 Apr 6;10:16. doi: 10.25259/JCIS_132_2019. eCollection 2020.
To determine, time to angiography for patients with positive gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) on prior investigation (endoscopy [ES], nuclear medicine [NM] Tc99m red blood cells (RBC) scan, or computed tomography angiography), affects angiographic bleed identification.
Visceral Angiograms performed from January 2012 to August 2017 were evaluated. Initial angiograms performed for GIB were included in the study. Exclusion criteria included recent abdominal surgery or procedure (30 days), empiric embolization (embolization without visualized active bleeding), and use of vasodilators, or subsequent angiogram. Timing and results of ES, NM Tc99m RBC scan, or computed tomography angiogram and catheter angiogram were recorded. In addition, age, gender, angiogram time, anti- platelet therapy, anti-coagulation therapy, bleed location, international normalized ratio, and units of packed RBCs received in the 24 h before catheter angiography were included in the study.
One hundred and seventy angiograms were included in the final analysis. Forty-three angiograms resulted in the identification of an active bleed (68.9 years, and 67.4% male). All of these patients were embolized successfully. One hundred and twenty-seven angiograms failed to identify an active bleed (70.4 years, and 49.6% male). No significance was found across the two groups with respect to time from prior positive investigation. Receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated that units of packed RBCs received in the preceding 24 h were correlated with positive bleed identification on catheter angiography.
Time to angiography from prior positive investigation, including ES, NM Tc99m RBC scan, or computed tomography angiogram does not correlate with positive angiographic outcomes. Increasing units of packed RBCs administered in the 24 h before angiogram do correlate with positive angiographic findings.
确定先前检查(内镜检查[ES]、核医学[NM]锝99m红细胞(RBC)扫描或计算机断层血管造影)显示胃肠道出血(GIB)阳性的患者进行血管造影的时间是否会影响血管造影对出血的识别。
对2012年1月至2017年8月期间进行的内脏血管造影进行评估。因GIB进行的首次血管造影纳入研究。排除标准包括近期腹部手术或操作(30天内)、经验性栓塞(未发现活动性出血的栓塞)、使用血管扩张剂或后续血管造影。记录ES、NM锝99m RBC扫描或计算机断层血管造影以及导管血管造影的时间和结果。此外,研究还纳入了年龄、性别、血管造影时间、抗血小板治疗、抗凝治疗、出血部位、国际标准化比值以及导管血管造影前24小时接受的浓缩红细胞单位数。
最终分析纳入了170例血管造影。43例血管造影发现了活动性出血(平均年龄68.9岁,男性占67.4%)。所有这些患者均成功进行了栓塞。127例血管造影未发现活动性出血(平均年龄70.4岁,男性占49.6%)。两组在先前阳性检查后的时间方面未发现显著差异。受试者操作特征分析表明,前24小时接受的浓缩红细胞单位数与导管血管造影时出血阳性识别相关。
从先前阳性检查(包括ES、NM锝99m RBC扫描或计算机断层血管造影)到进行血管造影的时间与血管造影阳性结果无关。血管造影前24小时输注的浓缩红细胞单位数增加与血管造影阳性发现相关。