Division of Health Services Research, Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, University of Iowa College of Pharmacy, Iowa City, Iowa, United States of America.
Center for Evaluation and Assessment, University of Iowa College of Education, Iowa City, Iowa, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2020 May 4;15(5):e0232627. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232627. eCollection 2020.
In the U.S., an estimated one in five individuals experience a mental illness annually which contribute to significant human and economic cost. Pharmacists serving in a public health capacity are positioned to provide first aid level intervention to people experiencing a mental health crisis. Research on pharmacy professionals (pharmacists, technicians, students) undergoing training in Mental Health First Aid (MHFA) can provide evidence of the potential benefits of such training. The objectives of this study were to 1) describe the reluctance and confidence to intervene in mental health crises of pharmacy professionals previously trained in MHFA, 2) describe their self-reported use of MHFA behaviors since becoming trained, and 3) describe participant open-ended feedback on their MHFA training.
An electronic survey was disseminated in May and June, 2019 using a four-email sequence to pharmacy professionals who had completed MHFA training from one of five pharmacist MHFA trainers throughout 2018. Domains included demographics, six Likert-type reluctance items, seven Likert-type confidence items for performing MHFA skills, and frequency of using a set of nine MHFA skills since being trained. Prompts collected open-ended feedback related to MHFA experiences and training. Descriptive statistics were used for scaled and multiple-choice items and a basic content analysis was performed on the open-ended items to group them into similar topics.
Ninety-eight out of 227 participants responded to the survey yielding a response rate of 44%. Participants reported high levels of disagreement to a set of reluctance items for intervening and overall high levels of confidence in performing a range of MHFA skills. Participant self-reported use of a set of MHFA skills ranged from 19% to 82% since being trained in MHFA. Almost half (44%) of participants had asked someone if they were considering suicide. A majority (61%) also had referred someone to resources because of a mental health crisis. Open-ended responses included positive experiences alongside important challenges to using MHFA in practice and recommendations including additional training focused on the pharmacy setting.
Pharmacy professionals in this evaluation reported little reluctance and high confidence related to using MHFA training and reported use of MHFA skills since being trained.
1)描述之前接受过心理健康急救(MHFA)培训的药学专业人员在干预心理健康危机方面的不情愿和信心;2)描述他们自接受培训以来自我报告的 MHFA 行为的使用情况;3)描述参与者对他们的 MHFA 培训的开放式反馈。
2019 年 5 月至 6 月,使用四封电子邮件序列向 2018 年期间接受过五位药剂师 MHFA 培训师之一的 MHFA 培训的药学专业人员发送了电子调查。该调查的内容包括人口统计学、六项 MHFA 技能实施的李克特式不情愿项目、七项 MHFA 技能实施的李克特式信心项目,以及自接受培训以来使用一组九项 MHFA 技能的频率。提示收集与 MHFA 经验和培训相关的开放式反馈。使用比例和多项选择项目的描述性统计数据,并对开放式项目进行基本内容分析,将其分为相似的主题。
227 名参与者中有 98 名对调查做出了回应,回应率为 44%。参与者报告说,他们在一组干预措施上存在强烈的不情愿,并且在执行一系列 MHFA 技能方面具有很高的信心。自接受 MHFA 培训以来,参与者自我报告的 MHFA 技能使用频率从 19%到 82%不等。近一半(44%)的参与者曾询问过某人是否考虑自杀。大多数(61%)参与者也因心理健康危机而将某人转介到资源处。开放式回复包括积极的体验,以及在实践中使用 MHFA 所面临的重要挑战,以及建议包括专注于药学环境的额外培训。
在这项评估中,药学专业人员报告说,他们在使用 MHFA 培训方面的不情愿程度较低,信心较高,并报告了自接受培训以来使用 MHFA 技能的情况。