The future of colorectal cancer screening: Parentalism or shared decision-making?
作者信息
Bretthauer Michael, Helsingen Lise M, Kalager Mette, Vandvik Per-Olav, Agoritsas Thomas, Guyatt Gordon
机构信息
Professor, Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Researcher, Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
出版信息
CMAJ. 2020 May 4;192(18):E484. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.74839.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
The future of colorectal cancer screening: Parentalism or shared decision-making?结直肠癌筛查的未来：家长式作风还是共同决策？
CMAJ. 2020 May 4;192(18):E484. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.74839.
2
The authors respond to "The future of colorectal cancer screening: Parentalism or shared decision-making?".作者们对《结直肠癌筛查的未来：家长式作风还是共同决策？》作出回应。
CMAJ. 2020 May 4;192(18):E485. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.74963.
3
Effectiveness of self-administered decision aids for people invited to participate in colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review protocol.邀请参与结直肠癌筛查人群使用的自我管理决策辅助工具的有效性：一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2017 Jun;15(6):1552-1560. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-002966.
4
Development and pilot-testing of a colorectal cancer screening decision aid for individuals with varying health literacy levels.开发并初步测试了一款针对不同健康素养水平人群的结直肠癌筛查决策辅助工具。
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Oct;102(10):1847-1858. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.04.029. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
5
Challenges for colorectal cancer screening decision modeling.结直肠癌筛查决策建模面临的挑战。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Aug;94(2):391-393. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.03.058. Epub 2021 May 8.
6
The Effect of a Shared Decision-Making Process on Acceptance of Colorectal Cancer Screening.共享决策过程对结直肠癌筛查接受度的影响。
Ann Fam Med. 2022 Jan-Feb;20(1):89. doi: 10.1370/afm.2765.
7
The value of models in informing resource allocation in colorectal cancer screening: the case of The Netherlands.模型在为结直肠癌筛查资源分配提供信息方面的价值：以荷兰为例。
Gut. 2015 Dec;64(12):1985-97. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309316. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
8
From guideline to practice: New shared decision-making tools for colorectal cancer screening from the American Cancer Society.从指南到实践：美国癌症协会推出的用于结直肠癌筛查的新型共同决策工具
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Jul;68(4):246-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21459. Epub 2018 May 30.
9
An electronic family health history tool to identify and manage patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.一种用于识别和管理结直肠癌风险增加患者的电子家庭健康史工具：一项随机对照试验的方案。
Trials. 2019 Oct 7;20(1):576. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3659-y.
10
The LEAD trial-The effectiveness of a decision aid on decision making among citizens with lower educational attainment who have not participated in FIT-based colorectal cancer screening in Denmark: A randomised controlled trial.LEAD 试验 - 丹麦未参与基于 FIT 的结直肠癌筛查的教育程度较低的公民在决策方面的决策辅助工具的效果：一项随机对照试验。
Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Feb;103(2):359-368. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.08.029. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
引用本文的文献
1
Gender bias in shared decision-making among cancer care guidelines: A systematic review.癌症护理指南中共享决策制定的性别偏见：系统评价。
Health Expect. 2023 Jun;26(3):1019-1038. doi: 10.1111/hex.13753. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
2
The authors respond to "The future of colorectal cancer screening: Parentalism or shared decision-making?".作者们对《结直肠癌筛查的未来：家长式作风还是共同决策？》作出回应。
CMAJ. 2020 May 4;192(18):E485. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.74963.
本文引用的文献
1
Colorectal cancer screening: It is not time for a radical shift.结直肠癌筛查：现在并非进行彻底转变的时候。
CMAJ. 2020 Jan 20;192(3):E51-E52. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.191566.
2
Disparities in Preventive Health Services: Targeting Minorities and Majorities.预防性健康服务的差异：针对少数群体和多数群体
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Feb 18;172(4):287-288. doi: 10.7326/M19-3899. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
3
Colorectal cancer screening with faecal immunochemical testing, sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy: a clinical practice guideline.粪便免疫化学检测、乙状结肠镜检查或结肠镜检查筛查结直肠癌：临床实践指南。
BMJ. 2019 Oct 2;367:l5515. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5515.
4
Trustworthy clinical guidelines.可靠的临床指南。
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Jun 7;154(11):774-5. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-11-201106070-00011.
Zotero 插件