Deparment of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, 200 UCLA Medical Plaza, Suite 420, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, Department of Medicine Statistics Core, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Ann Hematol. 2020 Jun;99(6):1217-1223. doi: 10.1007/s00277-020-04050-1. Epub 2020 May 4.
While fluid replacement therapy is a primary treatment modality used in vaso-occlusive crises for sickle cell disease, data is limited on its safety, efficacy, and variability. We performed a retrospective analysis on 157 unique patient encounters from 49 sickle cell patients hospitalized with a vaso-occlusive episode at our institution from 2013 to 2017. The median length of hospital stay was 4 days (IQR 2-7). The mean total amount of intravenous fluid administered during the hospitalization was 7.4 L (Std 9.6). The mean total amount of fluid intake including intravenous fluids, blood transfusions, and oral fluids was 14.2 L (Std 18.2). Multivariate analyses revealed significant associations between the development of any adverse event (including a new oxygen requirement, acute chest syndrome, aspiration event, other hospital-acquired infection, acute kidney injury, and intensive care unit transfer) and the following variables: intravenous fluid administered in the first 24 h (p = 0.001, OR 1.899, 95% CI 1.319-2.733), total amount of intravenous fluid administered (p = 0.005, OR 1.081, 95% CI 1.023-1.141), and total amount of fluid intake including oral fluids, blood transfusions, and intravenous fluids (p = 0.009, OR 1.046, 95% CI 1.011-1.081). Other factors found to be significantly associated with any adverse event were dialysis dependence prior to admission (p < 0.001, OR 12.984, 95% CI 3.660-46.056) and admission to an inpatient service versus an emergency room or observation unit (p = 0.008, OR 3.201, 95% CI 1.346-7.612). While fluid administration may theoretically slow the sickling process, this data suggests that fluid administration during a vaso-occlusive episode, and especially total volume given in the first 24 h, may also lead to adverse events.
虽然液体替代疗法是治疗镰状细胞病血管阻塞危象的主要治疗方法,但关于其安全性、疗效和变异性的数据有限。我们对 2013 年至 2017 年期间在我院因血管阻塞发作住院的 49 名镰状细胞病患者的 157 例独特患者就诊进行了回顾性分析。住院中位数为 4 天(IQR 2-7)。住院期间给予的静脉补液量平均为 7.4L(Std 9.6)。包括静脉补液、输血和口服补液在内的液体总摄入量平均为 14.2L(Std 18.2)。多变量分析显示,以下变量与任何不良事件(包括新的氧气需求、急性胸痛综合征、吸入事件、其他医院获得性感染、急性肾损伤和重症监护病房转移)的发生之间存在显著关联:24 小时内给予的静脉补液量(p=0.001,OR 1.899,95%CI 1.319-2.733)、给予的静脉补液总量(p=0.005,OR 1.081,95%CI 1.023-1.141)和包括口服补液、输血和静脉补液在内的液体总摄入量(p=0.009,OR 1.046,95%CI 1.011-1.081)。其他与任何不良事件显著相关的因素包括入院前依赖透析(p<0.001,OR 12.984,95%CI 3.660-46.056)和入院为住院患者而非急诊或观察病房(p=0.008,OR 3.201,95%CI 1.346-7.612)。虽然液体给药理论上可以减缓镰状化过程,但这些数据表明,在血管阻塞发作期间给予液体,尤其是在 24 小时内给予的总容量,也可能导致不良事件。