Division of General and Bariatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, East Carolina University Brody School of Medicine, 600 Moye Boulevard, Greenville, NC, 27834, USA.
Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Surg Endosc. 2020 Aug;34(8):3650-3655. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07609-1. Epub 2020 May 4.
The SAGES Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy (FUSE) program accompanied by a bench-top simulation has shown to improve knowledge of the safe use of energy devices. However, there are significant barriers and costs associated with delivering an effective structured simulation curriculum to a widespread international audience. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if bench-top simulation FUSE curriculum through telementoring is as effective as a live-in house proctor for electrosurgical training.
A two-armed multi-institutional randomized controlled trial was designed, including a 1-h didactic electrosurgery course (FUSE curriculum), followed by a structured 1-h bench-top simulation training session. For the simulation, participants were randomized to either a live proctor who delivered the course on-site (LIVE group), or a proctor from a remote location using videoconferencing platform (TELEM group). Pre- and post-curriculum (immediate and 6 months) knowledge and self-perceived comfort and competence were assessed. Data are expressed as median [interquartile range], *p < 0.05.
Sixty-five (35 LIVE; 30 TELEM) surgical trainees from three institutions participated. Baseline characteristics were similar. Total score on the exam improved from 47% [40-54] to 78% [71-84]* amongst all participants, with similar immediate post-curriculum scores in the LIVE group compared to the TELEM group (77% [69-83] vs 80% [75-85]). At 6 months, performance on the exam declined significantly for both groups, but remained similar between the two (LIVE: 59% [51-71] vs TELEM: 71% [57-77]). Participants in both groups reported feeling greater comfort and competence post-curriculum (immediate and at 6 months) compared to baseline, with no difference between the two groups.
A bench-top simulation FUSE course delivered via a telementoring platform seems to improve surgical trainees' knowledge and comfort in the safe use of electrosurgical devices as effectively as when it is delivered by a live proctor, despite long-term decay for both methods.
SAGES 基本外科能量使用(FUSE)计划伴随着台式模拟训练,已被证明可以提高对能量器械安全使用的知识。然而,向广泛的国际受众提供有效的结构化模拟课程存在显著的障碍和成本。本研究的目的是评估通过远程指导的台式模拟 FUSE 课程是否与现场住院主管一样有效地进行电外科培训。
设计了一项双臂多机构随机对照试验,包括 1 小时的电外科理论课程(FUSE 课程),随后进行 1 小时结构化的台式模拟培训。对于模拟,参与者随机分配到现场提供课程的现场主管(LIVE 组)或使用视频会议平台的远程主管(TELEM 组)。在课程前后(即时和 6 个月)评估知识以及自我感知的舒适度和能力。数据表示为中位数 [四分位数范围],*p < 0.05。
来自三个机构的 65 名(35 名 LIVE;30 名 TELEM)外科受训者参加了研究。基线特征相似。所有参与者的考试总分数从 47%[40-54]提高到 78%[71-84]*,LIVE 组和 TELEM 组的即时课后分数相似(77%[69-83]与 80%[75-85])。6 个月时,两组的考试成绩均显著下降,但两组之间相似(LIVE:59%[51-71]与 TELEM:71%[57-77])。两组参与者在课后都感到更舒适和更有能力(即时和 6 个月),与基线相比,两组之间没有差异。
通过远程指导平台提供的台式模拟 FUSE 课程似乎可以像现场住院主管那样有效地提高外科受训者安全使用电外科器械的知识和舒适度,尽管两种方法都存在长期衰减。