Suppr超能文献

椎板切除术联合椎弓根螺钉固定治疗胸段黄韧带骨化:与椎板截骨术及再植技术的对比分析

Subsection Laminectomy with Pedicle Screw Fixation to Treat Thoracic Ossification of Ligamentum Flavum: A Comparative Analysis with Lamina Osteotomy and the Replantation Technique.

作者信息

Zhang Jing-Tao, Lei Tao, Yang Liu, Lin Yong-Sheng, Wang Zhi-Hong, Cao Jun-Ming

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, The Third Hospital of HeBei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2020 Apr 17;16:311-319. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S235868. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are many surgical procedures that can be used to relieve compression caused by thoracic ossification of the ligamentum flavum (TOLF). The present study aims to retrospectively observe the differences in subsection laminectomy with pedicle screw fixation (SLPF) and lamina osteotomy and replantation with miniplate fixation (LORF) in the treatment of continuous TOLF.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From March 2014 to October 2017, 61 patients with continuous TOLF underwent SLPF (group A) or LORF (group B). The surgical duration, intraoperative blood loss, change in thoracic kyphosis, and perioperative complications were analyzed. Neurological function was evaluated in accordance with the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score and the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) neurological grading.

RESULTS

The surgical duration, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative bed-rest duration in group A were significantly lower than those observed in group B (P < 0.05). Both groups demonstrated a significant improvement in JOA score and ASIA grade (P < 0.05). The neurological recovery rate was 69.8% ± 13.5% in group A and 68.5% ± 12.7% in group B (P > 0.05). There was also a significant improvement in ASIA grade at the final follow-up (P < 0.05). During follow-up, the Cobb angle was significantly increased in group B (P < 0.05), whereas no significant difference was observed in group A (P > 0.05). The occurrence rate of perioperative complications was 15.6% (5/32 patients) in group A and 37.9% (11/29 patients) in group B (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Both SLPF and LORF significantly promote recovery of neurological function. SLPF has a shorter surgical duration, less intraoperative blood loss, and a lower complication rate. SLPF is more conducive to the correction of sagittal sequence and maintenance of thoracic stability.

摘要

背景

有多种外科手术可用于缓解胸椎黄韧带骨化(TOLF)所致的压迫。本研究旨在回顾性观察节段性椎板切除术联合椎弓根螺钉固定(SLPF)与椎板截骨术及微型钢板固定再植术(LORF)在治疗连续性TOLF中的差异。

患者与方法

2014年3月至2017年10月,61例连续性TOLF患者接受了SLPF(A组)或LORF(B组)治疗。分析手术时长、术中出血量、胸椎后凸变化及围手术期并发症。根据日本骨科协会(JOA)评分和美国脊髓损伤协会(ASIA)神经学分级评估神经功能。

结果

A组的手术时长、术中出血量及术后卧床时长显著低于B组(P<0.05)。两组的JOA评分和ASIA分级均有显著改善(P<0.05)。A组神经恢复率为69.8%±13.5%,B组为68.5%±12.7%(P>0.05)。末次随访时ASIA分级也有显著改善(P<0.05)。随访期间,B组Cobb角显著增加(P<0.05),而A组未观察到显著差异(P>0.05)。A组围手术期并发症发生率为15.6%(5/32例患者),B组为37.9%(11/29例患者)(P<0.05)。

结论

SLPF和LORF均能显著促进神经功能恢复。SLPF手术时长更短,术中出血量更少,并发症发生率更低。SLPF更有利于矢状位序列的矫正及胸椎稳定性的维持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/375c/7173862/b0e4bd4159cd/TCRM-16-311-g0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验