• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[心房颤动患者再次住院的危险因素]

[Risk factors for recurrent hospitalizations of patients with atrial fibrillation].

作者信息

Wang Y F, Lu S X, Xia S J, Jia Z X, Jiang C, He L, Du X, Ma C S

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100029, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2020 Apr 24;48(4):308-314. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20190727-00433.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20190727-00433
PMID:32370482
Abstract

To determine the predictors of recurrent hospitalizations among atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. We analyzed data from the Chinese Atrial Fibrillation Registry (CAFR), a prospective cohort study involving non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients from Augest 2011 to December 2017. A total of 5 349 NVAF patients with a minimum of 48 months follow-up were included for analysis. Data including patient demographics, complications, medical and ablation history were collected. The maximum number of all-cause hospitalizations within one-year for each patient served as the primary endpoint. Patients hospitalized less than twice within one-year were defined as non-recurrent hospitalizations group, those hospitalized at least twice within one-year were definned as recurrent hospitalizations group. Logistic regression model was used to identify associated risk factors for recurrent hospitalizations. Of 5 349 NVAF patients, those hospitalized for 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and at least 5 times within one-year was 2 703 (50.5%), 1 776 (33.2%), 642 (12.0%), 161(3.0), 52 (1.0%), 15 (0.3%), respectively. Eight hundred and seventy (16.3%) patients were included in recurrent hospitalizations group, 4 479 (83.7%) patients were included in non-recurrent hospitalizations group. Compare with non-recurrent hospitalizations group, patients in recurrent hospitalizations group was more likely to be older and female, more frequently had a history of hypertension, heart failure, coronary heart disesase, ischaemic stroke/transient ischaemic attack, diabetes mellitus, peptic ulcer, a AF duration for more than 1 year, medication including drugs for ventricular rate control, statin, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI)/angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) and higher CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc scores (0.05), but less frequently had higher education, a history of drinking, smoking and ablation (0.05). Multivariable analysis showed that age 50-64 (1.47, 95 1.20-1.80), age≥65 (1.89, 95 1.50-2.38), female (1.21, 95 1.01-1.46), hypertension history (1.42, 95 1.16-1.74), heart failure history (1.73, 95 1.37-2.18), coronary heart disease history (1.63, 95 1.31-2.03), peptic ulcer history (2.00, 95 1.18-3.39) were independent risk factors for recurrent hospitalizations, while higher education (college or above) (0.82, 95 0.69-0.99) was the protective factor for recurrent hospitalizations. Nearly 1 in 6 of AF patients were admitted to hospital more than once within one year in this NVAF cohort. Age≥50, female, hypertension history, heart failure history, coronary heart disease history, peptic ulcer history are associated with an increased risk of recurrent hospitalizations.

摘要

为确定心房颤动(AF)患者再次住院的预测因素。我们分析了来自中国心房颤动注册研究(CAFR)的数据,这是一项前瞻性队列研究,纳入了2011年8月至2017年12月的非瓣膜性心房颤动(NVAF)患者。总共纳入5349例至少随访48个月的NVAF患者进行分析。收集了包括患者人口统计学、并发症、医疗和消融病史等数据。将每位患者一年内全因住院的最大次数作为主要终点。一年内住院少于两次的患者被定义为非再住院组,一年内至少住院两次的患者被定义为再住院组。采用逻辑回归模型确定再住院的相关危险因素。在5349例NVAF患者中,一年内住院0次、1次、2次、3次、4次和至少5次的患者分别为2703例(50.5%)、1776例(33.2%)、642例(12.0%)、161例(3.0%)、52例(1.0%)、15例(0.3%)。870例(16.3%)患者被纳入再住院组,4479例(83.7%)患者被纳入非再住院组。与非再住院组相比,再住院组患者更可能年龄较大且为女性,更频繁有高血压、心力衰竭、冠心病、缺血性卒中/短暂性脑缺血发作、糖尿病、消化性溃疡病史,房颤持续时间超过1年,使用包括控制心室率药物、他汀类药物、血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)等药物,且CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc评分较高(P<0.05),但接受高等教育、有饮酒、吸烟和消融病史的频率较低(P<;0.05)。多变量分析显示,年龄50 - 64岁(1.47,95%CI 1.20 - 1.80)、年龄≥65岁(1.89,95%CI 1.50 - 2.38)、女性(1.21,95%CI 1.01 - 1.46)、高血压病史(1.42,95%CI 1.16 - 1.74)、心力衰竭病史(1.73,95%CI 1.37 - 2.18)、冠心病病史(1.

相似文献

1
[Risk factors for recurrent hospitalizations of patients with atrial fibrillation].[心房颤动患者再次住院的危险因素]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2020 Apr 24;48(4):308-314. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20190727-00433.
2
Incidence and predictors of hospitalization in patients with atrial fibrillation: results from the Chinese atrial fibrillation registry study.心房颤动患者住院的发生率和预测因素:来自中国心房颤动注册研究的结果。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021 Mar 19;21(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-01951-5.
3
Pattern of atrial fibrillation and risk of outcomes: the Loire Valley Atrial Fibrillation Project.房颤模式与结局风险:卢瓦尔河谷房颤项目。
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Sep 10;167(6):2682-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.06.118. Epub 2012 Jul 15.
4
The HAS-BLED score has better prediction accuracy for major bleeding than CHADS2 or CHA2DS2-VASc scores in anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation.在接受抗凝治疗的房颤患者中,HAS-BLED 评分对大出血的预测准确性优于 CHADS2 或 CHA2DS2-VASc 评分。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Dec 10;62(23):2199-204. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.08.1623. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
5
Early neurological outcomes according to CHADS2 score in stroke patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.非瓣膜性心房颤动患者根据 CHADS2 评分的早期神经学结局。
Eur J Neurol. 2012 Feb;19(2):284-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2011.03518.x. Epub 2011 Sep 14.
6
Reliable identification of "truly low" thromboembolic risk in patients initially diagnosed with "lone" atrial fibrillation: the Belgrade atrial fibrillation study.可靠识别最初诊断为“孤立”心房颤动患者中的“真正低”血栓栓塞风险:贝尔格莱德心房颤动研究。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012 Apr;5(2):319-26. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.111.966713. Epub 2012 Feb 8.
7
Factors associated with renal impairment in Chinese patients with non-valvular AF and without an established renal disease: a cross-sectional study.与无明确肾脏疾病的非瓣膜性心房颤动中国患者肾功能损害相关的因素:一项横断面研究。
Postgrad Med. 2020 Jun;132(5):452-457. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2020.1739914. Epub 2020 Mar 14.
8
CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc risk factors to predict first cardiovascular hospitalization among atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter patients.CHADS2 和 CHA2DS2-VASc 风险因素预测心房颤动/心房扑动患者首次心血管住院事件。
Am J Cardiol. 2012 May 15;109(10):1526-33. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.01.371. Epub 2012 Feb 22.
9
[Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: data from the Observatory of Cardiovascular Diseases in the province of Trieste (Italy)].[非瓣膜性心房颤动:来自意大利的里雅斯特省心血管疾病观测站的数据]
G Ital Cardiol (Rome). 2015 Jun;16(6):361-72. doi: 10.1714/1934.21032.
10
Evaluation of risk stratification schemes for ischaemic stroke and bleeding in 182 678 patients with atrial fibrillation: the Swedish Atrial Fibrillation cohort study.评估 182678 例心房颤动患者缺血性卒中和出血的风险分层方案:瑞典心房颤动队列研究。
Eur Heart J. 2012 Jun;33(12):1500-10. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr488. Epub 2012 Jan 13.