Physical Therapy Unit, Rehabilitation Service, Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofía, San Sebastián de los Reyes, Spain.
Department of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Alcorcón, Spain.
Acupunct Med. 2021 Apr;39(2):91-105. doi: 10.1177/0964528420920300. Epub 2020 May 5.
The aim of this study was to observe the medium-term effects on pain, disability, and psychological factors of a combination of myofascial trigger point (MTrP) dry needling (DN) with pain neuroscience education (PNE) versus DN alone versus control care as usual (CUC) in patients with chronic neck pain.
A total of 60 patients were randomly selected in a Spanish National Health Service Public Hospital and divided into three groups: 6 sessions of DN with 3 sessions of PNE (TrPDN + PNE group, n = 21), 6 sessions of DN alone (TrPDN group, n = 20), or 10 sessions of usual care (CUC group, n = 19). The primary outcome was neck pain intensity, while neck disability, medication intake, and psychological factors were secondary outcomes. These variables were measured at baseline, post-treatment, and at 1 month and 3 months after treatment.
TrPDN + PNE and DN alone were associated with greater reductions in pain intensity and disability compared to CUC (p < 0.01). TrPDN + PNE resulted in greater improvements in kinesiophobia, pain anxiety, and pain-related beliefs than DN alone and CUC (p < 0.01). No differences between groups were observed in medication intake, quality of life, catastrophizing, depression, or fear of pain (p > 0.05).
Provision of PNE and DN in the management of chronic neck pain in a Spanish National Health Service Public Hospital was associated with greater improvements in psychological factors than DN therapy only.
DN alone was more effective at reducing chronic non-specific neck pain and disability than CUC at 3-month follow-up. However, the inclusion of PNE combined with DN resulted in greater improvements in kinesiophobia, pain anxiety, and pain-related beliefs.
NCT03095365 (ClinicalTrials.gov).
本研究旨在观察肌筋膜触发点(MTrP)干针(DN)联合疼痛神经科学教育(PNE)与单独 DN 治疗及常规护理(CUC)对慢性颈痛患者疼痛、残疾和心理因素的中期影响。
在一家西班牙国家卫生服务公立医院中,共随机选择了 60 名患者,并将其分为三组:6 次 DN 治疗联合 3 次 PNE(TrPDN+PNE 组,n=21)、6 次单独 DN 治疗(TrPDN 组,n=20)或 10 次常规护理(CUC 组,n=19)。主要结局为颈痛强度,次要结局为颈部残疾、药物摄入和心理因素。这些变量在基线、治疗后以及治疗后 1 个月和 3 个月时进行测量。
与 CUC 相比,TrPDN+PNE 和单独 DN 治疗均与疼痛强度和残疾的更大降低相关(p<0.01)。TrPDN+PNE 与单独 DN 治疗和 CUC 相比,在运动恐惧、疼痛焦虑和与疼痛相关的信念方面有更大的改善(p<0.01)。各组间药物摄入、生活质量、灾难化、抑郁或疼痛恐惧无差异(p>0.05)。
在西班牙国家卫生服务公立医院中,在慢性颈痛管理中提供 PNE 和 DN 治疗与仅接受 DN 治疗相比,在心理因素方面有更大的改善。
单独 DN 治疗在 3 个月随访时对慢性非特异性颈痛和残疾的缓解效果优于 CUC,但纳入 PNE 联合 DN 治疗可显著改善运动恐惧、疼痛焦虑和与疼痛相关的信念。
NCT03095365(ClinicalTrials.gov)。