Increased Rate of Successful First Passage Recanalization During Mechanical Thrombectomy for M2 Occlusion.

BACKGROUND

Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is the standard of care for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion. However, the true safety and efficacy of MT in medium-size vessel occlusions such as the M2 segment of the middle cerebral artery have yet to be completely defined. In this study, we analyze the safety and efficacy of MT in M2 occlusions compared with M1 occlusions.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed of patients with AIS secondary to M1 and M2 occlusions between 2011 and 2018. The inclusion criteria were 1) AIS secondary to M1 or M2 occlusion, 2) MT performed by stentrieval technique alone, aspiration technique, or combined stentrieval-aspiration techniques. Basic patient characteristics, number of passages, first passage recanalization success (≥TICI [Thrombolysis in Cerebral Ischemia] grade 2b), total recanalization success, hemorrhagic complications (including intracerebral hemorrhage [ICH] and subarachnoid hemorrhage), and clinical outcomes were compared between both groups.

RESULTS

Two hundred and sixty patients met the inclusion criteria; 171 patients had M1 occlusion versus 89 with M2 occlusion. First passage recanalization success rate was significantly higher in the M2 group (55.1% vs. 39.2%; P = 0.015). Total recanalization success rate was higher in the M2 group but did not reach significance (83% vs. 75%; P = 0.128). Subarachnoid hemorrhage rate was significantly higher in the M2 group (25% vs. 12%; P = 0.010) but there was no difference for ICH complications (14.6% vs. 16.4%; P = 0.711).

CONCLUSIONS

MT for M2 occlusions has similar overall efficacy to that for M1 occlusions, but with higher first-pass successful recanalization rates. MT for M2 occlusions has a higher risk of associated subarachnoid hemorrhage.