Suppr超能文献

系统评价和荟萃分析当前血栓切除术技术的初次通过效果率及其与临床结局的关联。

Systematic review and meta-analysis of current rates of first pass effect by thrombectomy technique and associations with clinical outcomes.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA

Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

J Neurointerv Surg. 2021 Mar;13(3):212-216. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016869. Epub 2021 Jan 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

First pass effect (FPE) in mechanical thrombectomy is thought to be associated with good clinical outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To determine FPE rates as a function of thrombectomy technique and to compare clinical outcomes between patients with and without FPE.

METHODS

In July 2020, a literature search on FPE (defined as modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) 2c-3 after a single pass) and modified FPE (mFPE, defined as TICI 2b-3 after a single pass) and mechanical thrombectomy for stroke was performed. Using a random-effects meta-analysis, we evaluated the following outcomes for both FPE and mFPE: overall rates, rates by thrombectomy technique, rates of good neurologic outcome (modified Rankin Scale score ≤2 at day 90), mortality, and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) rate.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven studies comprising 16 870 patients were included. Overall rates of FPE and mFPE were 28% and 45%, respectively. Thrombectomy techniques shared similar FPE (p=0.17) and mFPE (p=0.20) rates. Higher odds of good neurologic outcome were found when we compared FPE with non-FPE (56% vs 41%, OR=1.78) and mFPE with non-mFPE (57% vs 44%, OR=1.73). FPE had a lower mortality rate (17% vs 25%, OR=0.62) than non-FPE. FPE and mFPE were not associated with lower sICH rate compared with non-FPE and non-mFPE (4% vs 18%, OR=0.41 for FPE; 5% vs 7%, OR=0.98 for mFPE).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that approximately one-third of patients achieve FPE and around half of patients achieve mFPE, with equivalent results throughout thrombectomy techniques. FPE and mFPE are associated with better clinical outcomes.

摘要

背景

机械取栓中的首次通过效应(FPE)被认为与良好的临床结果相关。

目的

确定取栓技术与 FPE 之间的关系,并比较有 FPE 和无 FPE 的患者的临床结果。

方法

2020 年 7 月,对 FPE(定义为单次通过后改良的脑梗死溶栓(TICI)2c-3)和改良 FPE(mFPE,定义为单次通过后 TICI 2b-3)与机械取栓治疗卒中的文献进行了检索。使用随机效应荟萃分析,我们评估了 FPE 和 mFPE 的以下结果:总体发生率、按取栓技术的发生率、良好神经功能结局(90 天改良 Rankin 量表评分≤2)的发生率、死亡率和症状性颅内出血(sICH)发生率。

结果

纳入了 67 项研究,共包括 16870 例患者。FPE 和 mFPE 的总体发生率分别为 28%和 45%。不同取栓技术的 FPE (p=0.17)和 mFPE (p=0.20)发生率相似。与非 FPE 相比,FPE 具有更高的良好神经功能结局的可能性(56% vs 41%,OR=1.78),与非 mFPE 相比,mFPE 具有更高的良好神经功能结局的可能性(57% vs 44%,OR=1.73)。FPE 的死亡率(17%)低于非 FPE(25%)。与非 FPE 和非 mFPE 相比,FPE 和 mFPE 与较低的 sICH 发生率无关(4% vs 18%,OR=0.41 用于 FPE;5% vs 7%,OR=0.98 用于 mFPE)。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,大约三分之一的患者可实现 FPE,约一半的患者可实现 mFPE,不同取栓技术的结果相似。FPE 和 mFPE 与更好的临床结果相关。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

7
Water content for clot composition prediction in acute ischemic stroke.用于预测急性缺血性脑卒中血栓成分的含水量。
PLoS One. 2024 May 24;19(5):e0304520. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304520. eCollection 2024.
10
Endovascular Detection of Catheter-Thrombus Contact by Vacuum Excitation.真空激发检测导管-血栓接触
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2024 Jun;71(6):1926-1936. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2024.3356390. Epub 2024 May 20.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验